Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Examining the associations among produce prescription program implementation characteristics and incentive redemption
Victoria A Zigmont1, Bailey Houghtaling1,2, Elise Mitchell1
1Center for Nutrition & Health Impact, Omaha, NE, United States.
Background:
Produce prescription programs (PRx) have the potential to improve participants' fruit and vegetable intake (FVI), and food security (FS), but further information is needed to understand which program characteristics contribute to these participant outcomes.
Purpose:
To explore the associations between PRx design characteristics, incentive redemption, and program-level participant outcomes including FVI, FS, and perceived health.
Methods:
An ecological, exploratory study with a quasi-experimental design (one group pre-test post-test) following the exploration, preparation, implementation, sustainment (EPIS) framework was used among Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program (GusNIP)-funded PRxs in the United States. Data were sourced from a GusNIP program operator survey (84% response rate; n = 80), PRx redemption data (n = 77), and an outcomes sample including redemption and participant outcomes data (n = 39 programs). Redemption data included program-level incentive distribution and redemption rates, measured as the dollar amount of incentives redeemed per participant per month. Participant data included changes in FVI (dietary screener questionnaire), FS (USDA household FS survey module), and perceived health (healthy days). Nonparametric and parametric comparisons were examined between program characteristics with program level-redemption rates and changes in aggregated participant-level outcomes.
Results:
Program-level characteristics, design, and implementation features were associated both positively and negatively with redemption data and changes in participant outcomes including FVI, FS, and perceived health. Programs that provide more funds but serve fewer participants, offer transportation assistance, and offer staff training were positively associated with improved aggregated participant outcomes.
Conclusions:
This exploratory research identified factors to be considered for promoting favorable program and participant outcomes in GusNIP PRx and similar initiatives.
Related Concept Videos
Operant Conditioning Intervention
In operant conditioning, behaviors that are...
Primary and Secondary Reinforcers
Effective reinforcers for humans vary depending on the individual and the context. Primary reinforcers, such as food, water, sleep, shelter, and pleasure, have inherent value and satisfy basic biological...
The Placebo Effect
Prescription, Nonprescription and Orphan Drugs
The misuse and addiction to prescription drugs is a growing problem that can affect people of all age groups, specifically teenagers. This can happen when prescription medications are used in ways not intended by the prescriber, such as taking someone else's prescription or using medication for...
Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation
The theory differentiates between intrinsic and...
