Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

An Immunohistopathologic Study to Profile the Folate Receptor Beta Macrophage and Vascular Immune Microenvironment in Giant Cell Arteritis
Published on: February 8, 2019
Utility of the SCVP consensus statement of temporal artery biopsy for arteritis
Xin Duan1, Cory T Bernadt1, Jon H Ritter1
1Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, Department of Pathology and Immunology, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Insights
The new Society for Cardiovascular Pathology (SCVP) guidelines for temporal artery biopsies (TAB) simplify diagnosing arteritis. This schema aids in identifying challenging cases, including non-giant cell arteritis (non-GCA), improving reporting consistency.
Area of Science:
- Pathology
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Rheumatology
Background:
- The Society for Cardiovascular Pathology (SCVP) developed a consensus statement for diagnosing and reporting temporal artery biopsies (TAB).
- The statement addresses diagnostic challenges like adventitial inflammation, absence of giant cells, and non-arteritis changes.
- It proposes a three-tiered diagnostic scheme and highlights the importance of identifying various vasculitides, with giant cell arteritis (GCA) being the most prevalent.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical utility of the SCVP's new TAB diagnostic and reporting schema.
- To assess the schema's effectiveness in routine practice and its ability to handle challenging cases.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 105 temporal artery biopsies (TABs) from 102 patients (January 2022 - December 2023).
- Blind review of slides categorized using the SCVP consensus document: active arteritis, no arteritis, or healed arterial injury.
- Active arteritis cases were further classified as GCA or non-GCA, noting the presence of giant cells.
Main Results:
- The SCVP schema was applied to 105 TABs, diagnosing 12 cases as active arteritis.
- Eight of these 12 cases lacked giant cells, suggesting non-GCA arteritis.
- The schema successfully reclassified two cases originally diagnosed as GCA to no arteritis due to adventitial-only inflammation, demonstrating its utility in challenging diagnoses.
Conclusions:
- The SCVP TAB consensus schema is readily implementable in clinical practice.
- The schema aids in diagnosing difficult cases, including those with adventitial-only inflammation or non-GCA arteritis.
- It establishes a unified and consistent approach to reporting temporal artery biopsy findings.
Introduction:
The Society for Cardiovascular Pathology (SCVP) recently released a consensus statement on diagnosing and reporting temporal artery biopsies (TAB). The document addresses diagnostic challenges such as adventitial inflammation, absence of giant cells, and non-arteritis changes. It recommends a three-tiered diagnostic scheme and emphasizes recognizing other types of vasculitis although giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common type. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed archival TABs to evaluate the utility of this new statement.
Materials And Methods:
We identified all TABs from our files from 1/2022-12/2023. Slides were blindly reviewed without knowing the original diagnoses. Cases were categorized as active arteritis, no arteritis, or healed arterial injury per the consensus document. Active arteritis cases were further classified as GCA or non-GCA, and the presence of giant cells was noted. Results were compared with the original diagnoses to assess the diagnostic and reporting utility of the SCVP schema.
Results:
We included 105 TABs from 102 patients (66 female, 36 male; ages 45-93 years; mean age 71 ± 10 years). Using the consensus guidelines, 12 cases were diagnosed as active arteritis. Notably, 8 of 12 cases did not display giant cells in the media, and 1 case showed an exuberant number of eosinophils, suggesting that non-GCA arteritis should be considered. These 12 cases plus another 2 were originally diagnosed as GCA; the latter 2 cases were reclassified as no arteritis, with a comment noting adventitial-only inflammation. Two additional cases were classified as no arteritis, with original descriptive diagnosis of chronic inflammation in only adventitia. The remaining 89 cases were diagnosed as no arteritis, consistent with the original diagnosis. We did not find any case of healed arterial injury. The most common non-arteritis findings were neointimal hyperplasia and internal elastic lamina calcifications, consistent with age-related changes.
Conclusion:
The new SCVP TAB consensus schema can be easily implemented in routine clinical practice. It is also helpful in formulating diagnoses for challenging cases, such as those with adventitial-only inflammation or non-GCA arteritis. Additionally, it provides a unified and consistent reporting scheme.
Related Concept Videos
Assessing Body Temperature - Temporal Artery
Step 1: Perform hand hygiene and don a fresh pair of gloves to prevent cross-infection and ensure patient safety.
Step 2: Explain the procedure to the patient to establish trust. Clear communication establishes trust with the patient, ensures they understand what to expect, promotes cooperation, and enhances comfort during the procedure.
Step 3: Assess the patient's forehead...
Temperature Measurement Sites
Oral: When assessing oral temperature, the thermometer tip should be placed under the tongue in the posterior sublingual pocket. It offers accurate readings and can be...
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation