Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Acquisition and Semi-Automated Analysis of Respiratory Muscle Surface Electromyography
Published on: January 24, 2025
Millimeter-Wave Radar-Based ECG Reconstruction Using Respiratory Harmonic Suppression and CA-WTBNet
Bowen Xiao1, Chuyi Zhou2, Lu Wang1
1School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China.
Abstract:
Millimeter-wave radar enables non-contact monitoring of cardiac activity and therefore has the potential to reconstruct electrocardiogram signals without surface electrodes. However, existing radar-based electrocardiogram reconstruction methods still suffer from incomplete extraction of heartbeat-related information and insufficient modeling of electrocardiogram-related features, which limits reconstruction accuracy. To address these issues, this study proposes a millimeter-wave radar-based electrocardiogram reconstruction method that integrates a respiratory-harmonic-suppressed multi-channel signal-processing frontend with the proposed CA-WTBNet deep reconstruction network. First, based on maximal overlap discrete wavelet transform-based multi-resolution analysis, respiratory harmonics mixed into heartbeat-related components are suppressed by combining respiratory harmonic detection with a heart-rate frequency protection strategy, while cardiac-related information is preserved as much as possible. A multi-channel input representation is then constructed. Meanwhile, the proposed deep reconstruction network is developed to jointly model complementary channel-wise features, local waveform morphology, and temporal dependencies by integrating channel-attention mechanisms, convolutional residual modules, window-based Transformer blocks, and bidirectional long short-term memory. Experiments conducted on the public dataset show that our method achieves an average Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.9641, a mean normalized root mean square error of 0.0458, an average R-peak F1 score of 0.9956, and an average R-peak timing error of 3.13 ms on the test set. In comparison with related studies on the same public Resting dataset, the proposed method achieves the best overall performance among the compared methods, with a 0.53% improvement in Pearson correlation coefficient and a 10.20% reduction in normalized root mean square error over the best-performing compared method.

