Road Surface Condition Evaluation Using Imaging, LiDAR, and Multi-Grade Navigation Systems

Road surface condition monitoring is critical for ensuring safe and efficient transportation networks. This study proposes and evaluates a framework that compares imagery-, Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR), and accelerometer-based approaches for pavement anomaly detection. The analysis first focused on a 5-mile urban roadway segment, in which all three sensing modalities were evaluated under identical survey conditions using manually interpreted reference anomalies to compare detection accuracy, severity classification, and processing efficiency. The imagery-based Convolutional Transformer-based Crack Segmentation (CT-CrackSeg) model achieved a precision, recall, and F1-score of 88.5%, 88.5%, and 88.5%, respectively, but remained sensitive to environmental factors such as shadows, curbs, roadside features, and pavement texture variations. The LiDAR-based method achieved an F1-score of 93.0%, while the accelerometer-based Isolation Forest and Adaptive Threshold methods achieved F1-scores of 95.2% and 97.2%, respectively. These results indicate strong detection performance under the evaluated validation conditions; however, the reported precision values should be interpreted as dataset-specific rather than universal performance levels. Given the accelerometer-based approach's strong detection performance, minimal processing time, and low deployment cost, it was further applied across a 36-mile roadway network to evaluate its scalability for network-level monitoring. Across the full route, the spatial agreement among accelerometer systems exceeded 0.91, while the agreement between the two detection methods exceeded 0.96, with 962-996 surface defects detected depending on the sensor and method. Integrating the anomaly detection results into a Potree-based web portal enabled interactive validation with geotagged imagery and point clouds, improving interpretability and diagnostic insight. Overall, the findings highlight that accelerometer-based monitoring, even with consumer-grade sensors, provides a practical, scalable, and low-cost solution for pavement evaluation, while LiDAR and imagery serve as complementary tools for detailed verification and characterization.