Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Halogenated Agent Delivery in Porcine Model of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome via an Intensive Care Unit Type Device
Published on: September 24, 2020
Prehospital PEEP for Acute Respiratory Distress: Protocol for a Scoping Review
Daniel Wittrock1,2,3, Joschka Martin Bauer4, Daniel Hägi-Pedersen4,5
1ZUPREME, Prehospital Centre, Naestved, Denmark.
Background:
Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) can improve oxygenation and reduce the work of breathing in patients with acute respiratory distress. In the prehospital setting, systems providing continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) and adjustable pressure-limiting (APL) valves are used inconsistently, and the evidence base is heterogeneous across their use in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, pneumonia and cardiogenic pulmonary oedema.
Purpose:
This scoping review aims to map the existing evidence on prehospital use of PEEP-based ventilation in adults with acute respiratory distress, including reported clinical outcomes and safety.
Methods:
This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and reported in line with the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). We will systematically search MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) with support from a research librarian. Empirical studies of adults (≥ 18 years) receiving PEEP-based ventilation in the prehospital setting will be eligible, including randomised controlled trials, observational studies, case series and well-described case reports. Two independent reviewers will screen, extract and map the data on study characteristics, interventions, comparators and outcomes, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Methodological quality will be appraised at study level using the Jadad Scale for randomised trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort and case-control studies.
Anticipated Results:
We expect to identify a limited but clinically relevant body of evidence reporting effects on oxygenation, dyspnoea severity, escalation to advanced airway management, adverse events and feasibility. The findings will be synthesised narratively and presented in descriptive and tabular form. We specifically anticipate sparse evidence for the prehospital use of APL systems.
Conclusion:
This scoping review will provide a comprehensive mapping of prehospital PEEP use in adults with acute respiratory distress, summarising its clinical effects, safety signals and feasibility, and identifying gaps to inform future studies.
Related Concept Videos
Respiratory Assessment: Purpose and Indications
Objectives and Importance:
The primary goal of respiratory assessment is to evaluate patients at early risk of clinical deterioration. Since respiratory distress often precedes other signs of declining health, breathing patterns and sounds become a...
Assessment of Respiration
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like asthma or COPD,...
Acute Respiratory Failure-IV
Respiratory System Abnormal Finding I: Inspection and Percussion
Inspection Findings
During an inspection, several findings may suggest the presence of respiratory distress or disease. Pursed-lip breathing, where exhalation is slowed by...
Acute Respiratory Failure-V
Ensure that patients are monitored continuously for their response to therapy, including changes in...
Acute Respiratory Failure-II
The underlying physiological abnormalities that contribute to hypoxemic respiratory failure include: