Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

05:07
Multimodality Diagnosis of Mesenteric Ischemia
Published on: July 21, 2023
Intraoperative Doppler Ultrasonography with Superb Microvascular Imaging for Intestinal Perfusion Assessment in
Atsushi Hirata1, Gaku Ohira1, Satoko Arai1
1Department of Frontier Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon
|July 31, 2026
Summary
This study explored superb microvascular imaging (SMI) as a novel method to assess intestinal perfusion during colorectal cancer surgery, finding it technically feasible and reproducible, though differences in perfusion boundaries compared to indocyanine green fluorescence imaging (ICG-FI) warrant further validation.
Area of Science:
- Surgical Oncology
- Medical Imaging
- Vascular Imaging
Background:
- Intraoperative indocyanine green fluorescence imaging (ICG-FI) aids in reducing anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery.
- Limitations of ICG-FI include contrast agent use, repeatability issues, and timing-dependent interpretation.
- There is a need for alternative methods to assess intestinal perfusion during surgery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the utility of Doppler ultrasonography with superb microvascular imaging (SMI) for assessing intestinal perfusion during colorectal cancer surgery.
- To compare the perfusion boundary identified by SMI with that identified by ICG-FI.
- To evaluate the inter-observer reproducibility and safety of the SMI method.
Main Methods:
- A single-center prospective pilot study enrolled patients undergoing colorectal cancer resection with anastomosis.
- Intramural microvascular flow was assessed using SMI to determine the perfusion boundary, followed by ICG-FI.
- The primary endpoint was the difference in blood flow boundaries between ICG-FI and SMI; secondary endpoints included inter-observer reproducibility and safety.
Main Results:
- The median difference in perfusion boundaries between ICG-FI and SMI was -4 mm, with SMI indicating a more proximal boundary.
- Inter-observer variability for SMI boundary detection showed a median absolute difference of 2 mm.
- The SMI method was technically feasible, with analyzable data obtained in seven of eight patients, and no procedure-related adverse events occurred.
Conclusions:
- Intraoperative SMI is a technically feasible and reproducible method for assessing intestinal perfusion boundaries during colorectal cancer surgery.
- Differences exist in perfusion boundary location between SMI and ICG-FI.
- Further prospective validation is required for clinical implementation of SMI.
