Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 21, 2026

Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
Beta-Blocker Use After Acute Myocardial Infarction: Differential Impact Across Heart Failure Subtypes in a Real-World
Tianshu Gu1, Sutao Hu1, Yukun Zhang1
1Tianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic-Molecular Function of Cardiovascular disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Insights
Beta-blocker therapy after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with heart failure (HF) shows benefits in patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF/HFmrEF), but not in those with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This highlights the importance of HF phenotype in guiding treatment decisions.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Medicine
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Beta-blocker (BB) efficacy post-acute myocardial infarction (AMI) may vary based on heart failure (HF) type in the current treatment landscape.
- Understanding these differences is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association of in-hospital beta-blocker (BB) therapy with 1-year outcomes in patients experiencing AMI complicated by heart failure (HF).
- To stratify these outcomes based on left ventricular ejection fraction phenotypes: HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and HF with reduced or mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF/HFmrEF).
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 5,557 patients with AMI and HF from the Tianjin Coronary Artery Disease Specialized Database.
- Utilized inverse probability of treatment weighting, Cox models, and competing risk analyses to assess outcomes.
- Conducted sensitivity analyses including propensity score matching and win ratio methods for robustness.
Main Results:
- The primary endpoint (1-year composite of cardiac death or HF rehospitalization) occurred in 15.5% of patients.
- A significant interaction by HF phenotype (P = 0.034) was observed.
- Beta-blocker therapy was linked to reduced risk of the primary endpoint, all-cause death, and cardiac death in HFrEF/HFmrEF patients, but not in HFpEF patients.
Conclusions:
- In-hospital beta-blocker use demonstrated a significant association with improved 1-year outcomes in patients with AMI complicated by HF and HFrEF/HFmrEF.
- No significant benefit was observed for beta-blocker therapy in the HFpEF subgroup.
- Findings underscore the differential impact of beta-blockers based on HF phenotype post-AMI.
Background:
Beta-blocker (BB) benefits after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) may differ by heart failure (HF) phenotype in the contemporary reperfusion era.
Objectives:
The authors evaluated associations of in-hospital BB therapy with 1-year outcomes after AMI complicated by HF, stratified by left ventricular ejection fraction phenotype.
Methods:
We analyzed 5,557 patients with AMI complicated by HF from the Tianjin Coronary Artery Disease Specialized Database, including 3,962/5,557 (71.3%) with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and 1,595/5,557 (28.7%) with HF with reduced or mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF/HFmrEF). The primary endpoint was a 1-year composite of cardiac death or HF rehospitalization. We assessed associations using inverse probability of treatment weighting, Cox models, and competing risk analyses. Sensitivity analyses comprised propensity score matching, win ratio, and time-stratified Cox models.
Results:
Overall, 859/5,557 patients (15.5%; 95% CI: 14.5%-16.4%) reached the primary endpoint by 1 year; median follow-up was 1,566 days (IQR: 882-2,354). Interaction by HF phenotype was significant (P = 0.034). After adjustment, BB therapy was associated with lower primary endpoint risk in HFrEF/HFmrEF (adjusted HR [aHR]: 0.590; 95% CI: 0.438-0.795; P < 0.001), but not in HFpEF. BB therapy was also associated with lower risks of all-cause death (aHR: 0.577; 95% CI: 0.395-0.841; P = 0.004) and cardiac death (aHR: 0.536; 95% CI: 0.349-0.823; P = 0.004) in HFrEF/HFmrEF. Sensitivity analyses yielded consistent findings.
Conclusions:
Among patients with AMI complicated by HF, in-hospital BB use was associated with lower 1-year adverse outcomes risk in HFrEF/HFmrEF, but not in HFpEF.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Adrenergic Antagonists: Chemistry and Classification of β-Receptor Blockers
Adrenergic Antagonists: Pharmacological Actions of β-Receptor Blockers
Antihypertensive Drugs: Types of β-Blockers
Heart Failure V: Medical Management