Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 5, 2026

Dry Powder and Nebulized Aerosol Inhalation of Pharmaceuticals Delivered to Mice Using a Nose-only Exposure System
Published on: April 6, 2017
Exhalation delivery system with fluticasone in chronic rhinosinusitis by eosinophil count and asthma and allergy
Anju T Peters1, Nithin D Adappa2, Rakesh K Chandra3
1Division of Allergy and Immunology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Background:
Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is an inflammatory disease of the nose and paranasal sinuses. Comorbid asthma, environmental allergies, and eosinophilia are associated with CRS. Exhalation delivery system with fluticasone (EDS-FLU) is approved for CRS; however, the influence of these features on treatment response remains unclear.
Objective:
To evaluate whether baseline blood eosinophil (EOS) count, asthma, or allergies affect the response to EDS-FLU in patients with CRS.
Methods:
ReOpen1 and ReOpen2 were randomized, EDS-placebo-controlled studies. Patients with CRS were assigned (1:1:1) to EDS-FLU 186 μg, EDS-FLU 372 μg, or EDS-placebo, administered twice daily for 24 weeks. End points included composite symptom score at weeks 4, 8, and 12, 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test, and Patient Global Impression of Change at week 24. Outcomes were analyzed for subgroups defined by asthma (yes/no), environmental allergy (yes/no), and EOS count (0-299 vs ≥300 cells/µL).
Results:
Baseline characteristics were similar across groups (N = 547). Composite symptom score improvement with EDS-FLU vs EDS-placebo was observed across subgroups (least square means change at week 12 for EDS-FLU vs EDS-placebo in patients with asthma, -2.12 vs -1.36; without asthma, -2.40 vs -1.52; with allergy, -2.12 vs -1.24; without allergy, -2.37 vs -1.60; with EOS 0-299 cells/µL, -2.11 vs -1.56; with EOS ≥ 300 cells/µL, -2.48 vs -1.36; all P < .01). Similar results were observed for Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 and Patient Global Impression of Change. Treatment-by-subgroup interaction showed consistent benefits irrespective of asthma, allergy, or EOS count.
Conclusion:
These results support EDS-FLU as an effective treatment for CRS, independent of the underlying inflammatory endotype or common comorbid conditions. Because of the limitations of this analysis, further investigation is warranted.
Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT03781804 and NCT03960580.
Related Concept Videos
Asthma-IV: Diagnostic and Management
Clinical Assessment for Asthma:
This is the first step in diagnosing and managing asthma. It includes:
Inhaled Medications
Asthma I: Introduction
Asthma: Pathogenesis and Management
Asthma is classified as allergic and non-allergic. Allergens such as dust mites, pollen, and pet dander trigger allergic asthma, while factors like cold air, intense emotions, or exercise can induce non-allergic asthma.
Asthma III: Clinical Manifestations
Asthma-I: Introduction
