Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 11, 2026

A Test Bed to Examine Helmet Fit and Retention and Biomechanical Measures of Head and Neck Injury in Simulated Impact
Published on: September 21, 2017
Association between state-level syncope driving policies and motor vehicle crash rates in the United States
Luke Dreher1, Nandini Mishra1, John William Schleifer2
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona.
Objectives:
To evaluate whether jurisdiction-level mandatory physician reporting requirements and minimum driving-restriction duration after syncope or another relevant loss-of-consciousness event are associated with motor vehicle crash and fatality rates.
Methods:
This cross-sectional ecological study included the 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. Two policy domains were evaluated independently: mandatory versus nonmandatory physician reporting and minimum driving restrictions of less than 6 months versus 6 months or longer. Crash and fatality outcomes were normalized to licensed drivers, population, or registered vehicles. Primary analyses used unweighted, two-sided Welch t tests. Sensitivity analyses of older-driver crash rates incorporated separate adjustment for annual precipitation, average temperature, and urban-to-rural road mileage; denominator-weighted least-squares models weighted by the number of licensed older drivers; and leave-one-mandatory-jurisdiction-out analyses.
Results:
Six jurisdictions mandated physician reporting. Primary older-driver crash analyses included 49 jurisdictions. Older-driver crash rates were lower in mandatory-reporting jurisdictions than in nonmandatory-reporting jurisdictions (1,232.54 versus 2,217.85 per 100,000 licensed older drivers; mean difference, -985.32; 95% CI, -1,774.32 to -196.31; p = 0.020). The older-to-young crash-rate ratio was also lower (0.19 versus 0.27; mean difference, -0.086; 95% CI, -0.153 to -0.019; p = 0.015). The association with older-driver crash rates remained significant after each ecological adjustment and in the denominator-weighted model (810.0 versus 2,405.9; coefficient, -1,595.9; 95% CI, -2,237.1 to -954.8; p < 0.001), as well as after sequential exclusion of each mandatory-reporting jurisdiction. Minimum restrictions of 6 months or longer were not significantly associated with older-driver crash rates in the primary unweighted comparison (1,830.10 versus 2,314.84; mean difference, -484.73; 95% CI, -1,091.80 to 122.33; p = 0.115), but were associated with lower rates in the denominator-weighted model (1,677.2 versus 2,593.9; coefficient, -916.8; 95% CI, -1,816.8 to -16.8; p = 0.046). This weighted association remained significant after adjustment for temperature but not after adjustment for precipitation or urban-to-rural road mileage. No significant fatality-rate differences were observed for either policy domain.
Conclusions:
Mandatory physician reporting was consistently associated with lower older-driver crash rates across primary and sensitivity analyses. Longer minimum restriction duration showed a supportive but model-dependent association. These findings suggest that an organized reporting and medical-review pathway may be more consequential than restriction duration alone, but the ecological design does not establish causality or individual driving risk.
Related Concept Videos
Introduction to Test of Independence
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence
H0: The two variables (factors)...
Relative Risk
Narcolepsy
Transient Ischemic Attack l: Introduction

