Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 26, 2026

Virtual Agent for Real-Time Motivational Interviewing by Integrating Adaptive Nonverbal Behavior and Language Models
Published on: December 23, 2025
Implementing a Cognitively Grounded Artificial Moral Advisor: A Multi-LLM Multi-Agent Approach Based on the
1Department of Computer Education, Sungkyunkwan University, 25-2, Seonggyungwan-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03063, Republic of Korea.
Abstract:
Large language model (LLM)-based artificial intelligence is increasingly used in ethically consequential human decision-making, yet fully autonomous machine ethics remains unrealistic, motivating architectures that support rather than replace human ethical judgment. This study introduces the Cognitive-Reflective Equilibration Architecture (CREA), a cognitively grounded artificial moral advisor that operationalizes the Cognitive-Reflective Equilibration Model (CREM), in which reflective reasoning guides ethical judgment from intuitive cognition toward a more advanced equilibrium among competing values, drawing on Piaget and Rawls. CREA implements CREM's 20-step process through four stage-aligned reasoning agents-Cognitive, Reflective, Equilibration, and Evaluation-coordinated via multi-LLM orchestration, in which auxiliary models independently explore principles, generate counterarguments, and score supporting and opposing considerations to externalize reflective deliberation. The architecture was empirically evaluated by comparing four configurations-single-agent, multi-agent, multi-LLM, and multi-LLM with knowledge- and reasoning-bank augmentation-across four indicators of advice quality using 500 matched execution units per configuration. All comparisons are system-internal: advice quality was scored by CREA's own multi-LLM measurement pipeline rather than by human ethicists, so the findings reflect relative differences among architectures under LLM-based self-evaluation, not normative validity. Within that scope, distributing reflective reasoning across multiple models was associated with higher reason-giving (justifiability) and normative-alignment scores relative to simpler configurations. CREA therefore offers an empirically characterized, auditable advisor architecture whose potential to scaffold human ethical judgment remains a hypothesis for user-centered validation rather than a demonstrated outcome.
Related Concept Videos
Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory
Primary Appraisal:...
Self-Awareness and Its Effects
The Influence of Cognition on Affect
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Cognitivism
Previously dominated by behaviorism, which prioritized observable behaviors and largely ignored mental processes, psychology transformed in the 1950s. Cognitive psychologists argue that understanding how we think and process information is...
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison