Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 19, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
Taming modality bias with counterfactual reasoning in multimodal knowledge graph completion
Bin Chen1, Jingqi Wu1, Hanting Shen1
1University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610054, Sichuan, China.
Abstract:
Multimodal Knowledge Graph Completion (MMKGC) is critical for reasoning over sparse relational data enriched with visual and textual features. However, existing methods struggle to generalize in real-world scenarios due to two pervasive challenges: (1) inter-entity heterogeneity, where modality availability is highly inconsistent (e.g., missing images or textual descriptions); and (2) intra-entity imbalance, where the semantic informativeness of modalities varies substantially, often causing models to rely on spurious statistical correlations. To address these limitations, we propose CoMu, a novel counterfactual-based multimodal fusion framework. CoMu first alleviates modality sparsity through a lightweight prompt-guided alignment strategy that recovers missing modalities at the raw feature level. Crucially, rather than relying on static fusion weights, CoMu introduces a counterfactual intervention mechanism that selectively removes modalities and measures the resulting causal deviation in prediction confidence, enabling adaptive feature integration based on their true causal contributions. Furthermore, we introduce a consistency-aware causal regularization to maintain semantic faithfulness during the intervention process. Extensive experiments on three real-world benchmark datasets demonstrate that CoMu effectively mitigates modality imbalance and spurious statistical correlations, consistently outperforming 19 state-of-the-art MMKGC baselines.
Related Concept Videos
Counterfactual Thinking
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
Deductive Reasoning
Inductive Reasoning
Hindsight Biases