Pediatric Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Modified Delphi Consensus by the EKLG Study Group on Indications, Surgical Techniques, and Postoperative Care
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 1, 2026

Corneal Donor Tissue Preparation for Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty
Published on: September 17, 2014
Nidhi Gupta1, Muralidhar Ramappa2, Massimiliano Serafino3
1Dr Shroffs Charity Eye Hospital, New Delhi, India; Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore.
Purpose:
To identify areas of consensus among global experts on the clinical management of pediatric endothelial keratoplasty (EK), including patient selection, timing, preoperative evaluation, technique selection, intraoperative standards, and postoperative care, and to provide a practical framework for surgeons earlier in their pediatric EK learning curve.
Design:
Modified Delphi-based global consensus study.
Participants:
International ophthalmologists with expertise in endothelial keratoplasty and pediatric corneal diseases.
Methods:
A series of consensus statements on pediatric EK were developed from iterative rounds of structured questions and statements posed to a panel of experts. Two rounds of asynchronous electronic questionnaires were followed by a structured hybrid discussion of unresolved items. Experts responded anonymously to statements assessing consensus and to revised items addressing indications, contraindications, timing, preoperative workup, technique selection, intraoperative standards, and postoperative management. Results are reported using item-specific denominators because occasional non-response occurred across the survey items.
Main Outcome Measures:
Consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement among the experts. Agreement between 60% and 69.9% was considered to be near consensus.
Results:
The consensus supported pediatric EK for congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy, aphakic or pseudophakic corneal edema, persistent corneal edema in congenital glaucoma, X-linked endothelial corneal dystrophy, iatrogenic endothelial decompensation, and trauma-related decompensation. EK was inappropriate for severe anterior segment dysgenesis with keratolenticular or extensive iridocorneal adhesions. In Round 2, experts further endorsed EK for failed penetrating keratoplasty due to endothelial failure, congenital glaucoma with visually significant Haab's striae, and forceps injury involving the visual axis. There was a consensus that the timing of intervention should be guided primarily by amblyopia risk rather than by a specific age cut off. Essential preoperative assessments included examination under anesthesia, B-scan ultrasonography, anterior segment optical coherence tomography, intraocular pressure measurement, ultrasound biomicroscopy, and refraction. Experts agreed that ultrathin-DSAEK and DSAEK are the predominant techniques, whereas DMEK is currently selectively reserved, usually for older children with uncomplicated anterior segment anatomy. Preferred intraoperative principles included air tamponade, anterior chamber maintenance, and donor graft under-sizing relative to the corneal diameter. Postoperative recommendations included early intraocular pressure assessment, topical corticosteroid therapy for > 6 months, regular monitoring for steroid response, selective contact lens use, and individualized long-term follow-up.
Conclusions:
The consensus statements provide globally endorsed recommendations for the clinical management of pediatric EK. These guidelines are relevant for corneal specialists providing a practical framework to benchmark practice, reduce variability, and guide future multicenter investigations.

