Associations between countermovement jump impulse and running kinetics following ACL reconstruction
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 3, 2026

Quantifying Recovery After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using the Torque- Velocity Relationship
Published on: July 24, 2026
Sami Ghani1, Eve-Merina Lucron1, Long Yiu Chan2
1Institute of Sport, Exercise and Health (ISEH), 170 Tottenham Court Rd, London W1T 7HA, United Kingdom; Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London (UCL), Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
Abstract:
Persistent deficits in lower-limb loading are commonly observed following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and may influence running biomechanics. Countermovement jump (CMJ) impulse can provide a phase-specific measure of force-time characteristics to reflect limb loading capacity; however, its relationship with running kinetics remains unclear. This study aimed to quantify phase-specific CMJ impulse following ACLR and examine associations with vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) metrics during treadmill running at the return-to-running phase. Forty-two participants performed three unilateral and bilateral CMJs on dual force plates and ran at 8 km/hr on an instrumented treadmill. Concentric, eccentric braking, and landing impulses were calculated. Running variables included weight acceptance rate, weight acceptance peak force, and maximum applied force. Inter-limb differences were assessed using Wilcoxon/paired t-tests. Impulse-vGRF relationships were analysed using Pearson/Spearman correlations and multiple linear regression. The ACLR limb exhibited significant deficits across all unilateral and bilateral CMJ phases, except for unilateral landing impulse. Deficits were greatest for unilateral concentric impulse (Δ1.3Ns·kg-0.67, d = 1.49, p < 0.001). Maximum applied force limb symmetry index (LSI) was explained by unilateral concentric impulse LSI (adjusted R2 = 0.25, p < 0.001). Maximum applied force of the affected limb was explained by unilateral concentric impulse (adjusted R2 = 0.38, p < 0.001). Weight acceptance peak force of the affected limb was explained by unilateral concentric and landing impulses (adjusted R2 = 0.37, p < 0.001). No meaningful relationships were observed for eccentric impulses or weight acceptance rate metrics. These findings indicate that jump impulse testing may provide clinically relevant indicators of running kinetics.
Related Concept Videos
Ankle Joint
Knee Joint
A total of seven ligaments support the knee joint. The patellar ligament, which is also attached to the quadriceps femoris group...
