Applying the Mountain Model for Evidence-Based Practice Program Evaluation to Academic Nursing
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 10, 2026

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
Published on: June 21, 2010
Christina L Stacy1, Jennifer E Wilson1, Veronica S King2
1Texas Woman's University College of Nursing.
Background:
Program evaluation is required by accrediting and regulatory bodies and is critical for sustaining robust, evidence-based improvements at the program level. Still, educators struggle to consistently apply appropriate evaluation frameworks. The inherent complexity and interdependence of curricular components render systematic program evaluation both daunting and labor-intensive.
Method:
This manuscript provides guidance on applying the Mountain Model for Evidence-Based Practice Program Evaluation (MM). The MM emphasizes problem identification, evidence synthesis, and the strategic selection of a program evaluation framework to support curricular improvements in academic nursing programs.
Results:
The authors provide practical guidance and recommendations based on a nationally recognized initiative that uses this approach.
Conclusion:
As nursing education continues to evolve, the MM offers an accessible, evidence-informed approach that empowers academic nurses to achieve meaningful, sustainable program outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Evaluation
Section...
The Scientific Method in Nursing Process
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be safely...
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Current Trends in Nursing II
Fundamentals of Nursing Process I
Patient-centered Care