Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Attitides towards peer review.

C E Garrick, K R Cox, A Rotem

    Australian Family Physician
    |May 1, 1979
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study explores the implementation of peer review in Australian healthcare, analyzing professional perspectives to ensure system acceptability and gain commitment for its adoption.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Overcoming resolution limits with quantum sensing.

    Nature communications·2019
    Same author

    Oxygen supply by photosynthesis to an implantable islet cell device.

    Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme·2014
    Same author

    How to…: use small groups in medical education.

    Medical teacher·2014
    Same author

    Review a Curriculum using a Pathway Analysis of Learning Difficulties.

    Medical teacher·2014
    Same author

    Plan and conduct programme evaluation.

    Medical teacher·2014
    Same author

    A novel device for islet transplantation providing immune protection and oxygen supply.

    Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme·2010
    Same journal

    Occupational violence and staff safety in general practice.

    Australian family physician·2018
    Same journal

    You should get that mole checked out: Ethical and legal considerations of the unsolicited clinical opinion.

    Australian family physician·2018
    Same journal

    Understanding the decision to commence a dose administration aid.

    Australian family physician·2018
    Same journal

    Psychological distress and risky sexual behaviours among women aged 16-25 years in Victoria, Australia.

    Australian family physician·2018
    Same journal

    A mixed-methods feasibility study of routinely weighing patients in general practice to aid weight management.

    Australian family physician·2018
    Same journal

    The Australian Mid-West Coastal Marine Wound Infections Study.

    Australian family physician·2018
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Health Policy
    • Medical Quality Assurance
    • Professional Standards

    Background:

    • The Australian Commonwealth Minister for Health initiated a review of medical standards.
    • The Australian Medical Association (AMA) responded by organizing a National Seminar on Peer Review.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To identify key questions and requirements for an acceptable peer review system in Australia.
    • To analyze participant feedback on peer review acceptability.
    • To examine implications and strategies for implementing peer review.

    Main Methods:

    • A National Seminar on Peer Review was organized by the AMA.
    • Participants were surveyed to identify questions and perceived necessities for peer review system acceptability.
    • Responses were analyzed to understand professional perspectives.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Analysis of participant questions and perceived necessities for peer review.
    • Discussion of implications for introducing peer review in Australia.
    • Identification of strategies to secure professional commitment.

    Conclusions:

    • Understanding professional perspectives is crucial for the successful introduction of peer review.
    • Strategies are needed to gain commitment from the medical profession for peer review implementation.