Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quantitative fit-test method for powered air-purifying respirators.

P L Lowry, L D Wheat, J M Bustos

    American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal
    |April 1, 1979
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Skeletal alterations in ovariectomized rats.

    Calcified tissue international·1985
    Same author

    Comparison of a sodium chloride aerosol filter test method to silica-dust and silica-mist filter test methods.

    American Industrial Hygiene Association journal·1978
    Same author

    Performance of single-use respirators.

    American Industrial Hygiene Association journal·1977
    Same author

    Letter: Read the lobbying report.

    American journal of public health·1975

    A new fit-test method quantifies powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR) leakage, showing high protection factors (PFs) with blowers on. Further studies are needed to validate lab results against real-world industrial use.

    Area of Science:

    • Occupational Health and Safety
    • Respiratory Protection Technology

    Background:

    • Powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs) are critical for worker protection in hazardous environments.
    • Quantitative fit testing is essential to ensure the effectiveness of respiratory protective equipment.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To describe and validate a novel fit-test method for powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs).
    • To quantitatively determine the leakage and protection factors (PFs) of various PAPRs.

    Main Methods:

    • Tested five types of PAPRs on 10 subjects with diverse facial sizes.
    • Employed exercises simulating typical light work movements during testing.
    • Measured PFs ranging from 50 to over 10,000.

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • All PAPRs provided PFs ≥ 1000 with blowers operational.
    • Two tight-fitting facepieces showed PFs between 50 and 100 with blowers off.
    • The method allowed for quantitative determination of PAPR leakage.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed fit-test method enables quantitative assessment of PAPR performance.
    • Laboratory-derived PFs indicate high protection levels under tested conditions.
    • Real-world industrial studies are necessary to confirm the predictive accuracy of these laboratory methods.