Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Latency of sequential eye movements: implications for reading.

K Rayner, M L Slowiaczek, C Clifton

    Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
    |December 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Does contextual strength modulate the subordinate bias effect? A reply to Kellas and Vu.

    Psychonomic bulletin & review·2016
    Same author

    Eye movement control in reading and visual search: Effects of word frequency.

    Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
    Same author

    Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination.

    Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
    Same author

    Must overlearned lists be scanned?

    Memory & cognition·2013
    Same author

    Recoding processes in recognition: Some effects of presentation rate.

    Memory & cognition·2013
    Same author

    Visual attention in reading: Eye movements reflect cognitive processes.

    Memory & cognition·2013

    Saccadic eye movement latency is very fast, similar to reading fixation duration. This challenges reading models that require extensive information processing before an eye movement. New experiments confirm these rapid saccadic eye movements.

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive psychology
    • Neuroscience
    • Ophthalmology

    Background:

    • Reading involves alternating eye movements (saccades) and pauses (fixations).
    • Current reading models often assume significant information processing during fixations before initiating the next saccade.
    • The timing of saccadic eye movements is crucial for understanding reading dynamics.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To re-evaluate and confirm estimates of saccadic eye movement latency.
    • To investigate the implications of rapid saccadic latency for existing models of reading.
    • To test whether experimental conditions could artificially inflate saccadic latency measurements.

    Main Methods:

    • Conducted three experiments designed to measure saccadic latency.
    • Employed specific conditions to rule out confounding factors like motor refractory periods, spatial, or temporal uncertainty.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Measured the time between stimulus presentation and the initiation of eye movements.

    • Main Results:

    • Experimental results support earlier findings of short saccadic eye movement latency (175-200 msec).
    • This latency is comparable to the duration of fixations during reading (200-250 msec).
    • The measured latencies were not influenced by motor refractory periods or uncertainty.

    Conclusions:

    • The rapid nature of saccadic eye movements challenges models of reading that require substantial processing during fixation.
    • Findings necessitate a revision of reading models to accommodate faster saccade initiation.
    • This research provides robust evidence for the speed of saccadic eye movements in the context of visual processing.