Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Emergency versus elective microsurgery.

I Eibschitz, K De Vries, M Sharf

    Acta Europaea Fertilitatis
    |July 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study compares emergency and elective gynecological microsurgery, finding significant differences in patient age, treatment protocols, and outcome evaluation. Differentiating these approaches is crucial for effective fertility preservation and restoration.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Acute toxicity patterns and their management after moderate and ultra- hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: A prospective cohort study.

    Clinical and translational radiation oncology·2024
    Same author

    A two-stage treatment of lentigo maligna using ablative laser therapy followed by imiquimod: excellent cosmesis, but frequent recurrences on the nose.

    The British journal of dermatology·2015
    Same author

    Recurrence rate of lentigo maligna after micrographically controlled staged surgical excision.

    The British journal of dermatology·2015
    Same author

    Collider Interplay for Supersymmetry, Higgs and Dark Matter.

    The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2015
    Same author

    A novel two-stage treatment of lentigo maligna using ablative laser therapy followed by imiquimod.

    The British journal of dermatology·2012
    Same author

    The role of the gynecologist in cases of sexual assault in adolescents.

    International journal of adolescent medicine and health·2012
    Same journal

    Incidence of Chlamydia trachomatis in women with PID: effectiveness of therapy.

    Acta Europaea fertilitatis·1995
    Same journal

    Human sperm cryopreservation and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production.

    Acta Europaea fertilitatis·1995
    Same journal

    Treatment of female hyperandrogenism: estroprogestinic therapy at low dose in an inversal sequential scheme.

    Acta Europaea fertilitatis·1995
    Same journal

    Use of new biologic markers in the ovulation induction.

    Acta Europaea fertilitatis·1995
    Same journal

    New therapeutic possibilities handling residual azoospermia.

    Acta Europaea fertilitatis·1995
    Same journal

    Activation of the acrosome reaction after treatment with human follicular fluid. A morphofunctional evaluation useful for in vitro fertilization.

    Acta Europaea fertilitatis·1995
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Gynecological Microsurgery
    • Reproductive Medicine
    • Surgical Techniques

    Background:

    • 148 gynecological microsurgical operations were performed over 30 months.
    • Operations were categorized into emergency (fertility preservation) and elective (fertility restoration).

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the characteristics, therapeutic approaches, and prognoses of emergency versus elective gynecological microsurgery.
    • To determine if a distinction between these two types of microsurgery is clinically valuable.

    Main Methods:

    • Comparative analysis of 148 emergency and elective gynecological microsurgical operations.
    • Evaluation of patient demographics, surgical timing, perioperative management (antibiotics, corticosteroids), procedural complexity, patient desire for pregnancy, and outcome assessment.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Emergency microsurgery patients were younger, including prefertility cases.
    • Elective procedures were timed to the proliferative phase and involved pre-, intra-, and postoperative antibiotics and corticosteroids.
    • Elective cases had more complex procedures, a consistent desire for pregnancy, and allowed for outcome evaluation (intrauterine pregnancy) and psychological assessment.

    Conclusions:

    • Significant differences exist between emergency and elective gynecological microsurgery beyond the shared microsurgical technique.
    • These distinctions in patient characteristics, treatment, and evaluation justify classifying microsurgical operations as either elective or emergency for improved clinical management.