Related Experiment Videos
Relapse coping and problem solving training following treatment for smoking.
Addictive Behaviors
|January 1, 1984
Summary
Problem-solving training aided smoking relapse prevention, supporting parts of the Marlatt and Gordon model. However, coping with guilt did not prevent relapse, contrary to predictions.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Psychology
- Addiction Research
- Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
Background:
- Relapse remains a significant challenge in smoking cessation programs.
- The Marlatt and Gordon cognitive-behavioral model offers a framework for understanding relapse.
- Effective maintenance strategies are crucial for long-term smoking abstinence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the efficacy of different maintenance strategies for smoking relapse prevention.
- To test specific components of the Marlatt and Gordon cognitive-behavioral model.
- To examine the role of self-efficacy and guilt in smoking relapse.
Main Methods:
- 33 subjects completing an initial smoking cessation program were randomized into four maintenance conditions.
- Interventions included problem-solving training, attention placebo control, and guilt-coping skills training.
- Self-efficacy expectations and smoking rates were monitored up to a 5-month follow-up.
Main Results:
- Problem-solving training significantly reduced relapse rates compared to an attention placebo control.
- Self-efficacy expectations were predictive of smoking rates over a 5-month period.
- Contrary to the model's predictions, training in coping with guilt was associated with increased relapse.
Conclusions:
- Problem-solving skills represent a viable strategy for preventing smoking relapse.
- Self-efficacy is a key predictor of sustained smoking abstinence.
- The role of guilt in relapse may be more complex than proposed by the Marlatt and Gordon model, requiring further investigation.