Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

A new pretrial screening program.

J R Rappeport, N P Conti, B Rudnick

The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

|January 1, 1983

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Thirty years and still growing.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·1999

Same author

Group dynamics in forensic pretrial decision-making.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·1997

Same author

The insanity defense and mental illness.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·1992

Same author

Effective courtroom testimony.

The Psychiatric quarterly·1992

Same author

Defendants pleading insanity: an analysis of outcome.

The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·1989

Same author

Belegaled: mental health and the law in the United States, 1986.

Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie·1987

Same journal

Posttraumatic stress disorder, pulp fiction, and the press.

The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·1996

Same journal

Trading forensic and family commitments.

The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·1996

Same journal

A comparison of treatment of paraphilias with three serotonin reuptake inhibitors: a retrospective study.

The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·1996

Same journal

Patients' attitudes toward having been forcibly medicated.

The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·1996

Same journal

A clinical study of competency in psychiatric inpatients.

The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·1996

Same journal

Postconcussional disorder and loss of consciousness.

The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·1996

See all related articles

Pretrial screening for legal responsibility and competency to stand trial can significantly reduce hospitalizations. Implementing these programs statewide is cost-effective and offers substantial financial savings.

Area of Science:

Forensic Psychiatry
Mental Health Law
Criminal Justice

Background:

Pretrial evaluations are crucial for determining a defendant's legal capacity.
Unnecessary hospitalizations incur significant costs for the justice system and healthcare.
Current screening practices may not be universally implemented or cost-effective.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the impact of pretrial screening on hospitalization rates.
To assess the cost-effectiveness of implementing statewide pretrial screening programs.
To advocate for the establishment of comprehensive pretrial evaluation services.

Main Methods:

Analysis of hospitalization data for defendants undergoing pretrial evaluation.
Cost-benefit analysis of implementing statewide screening programs.

Related Experiment Videos

Review of existing legal and psychiatric screening protocols.

Main Results:

Pretrial screening effectively reduces unnecessary hospitalizations for defendants.
Statewide programs can be developed with minimal initial investment.
Significant cost savings are achievable through reduced hospital stays and efficient resource allocation.

Conclusions:

Pretrial screening for competency and responsibility is a vital tool in the justice system.
Implementing these programs on a statewide level is economically beneficial.
Widespread adoption of such screening programs is recommended for all states.