Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Subtypes of reading disability.

B U Watson, D E Goldgar, K L Ryschon

    Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology
    |December 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study identified three subtypes of reading disability: visual processing deficit, generalized language disorder, and minimal deficit. These findings offer insights into reading disorder heterogeneity but may have limited clinical utility.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Association of gene variant type and location with breast cancer risk in the general population.

    Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2025
    Same author

    Assessing biases of information contained in pedigrees for the classification of BRCA-genetic variants: a study arising from the ENIGMA analytical working group.

    Hereditary cancer in clinical practice·2016
    Same author

    Multigene testing of moderate-risk genes: be mindful of the missense.

    Journal of medical genetics·2016
    Same author

    Tumour morphology predicts PALB2 germline mutation status.

    British journal of cancer·2013
    Same author

    Rare mutations in XRCC2 increase the risk of breast cancer.

    American journal of human genetics·2012
    Same author

    Cannabis, tobacco and domestic fumes intake are associated with nasopharyngeal carcinoma in North Africa.

    British journal of cancer·2009
    Same journal

    Relative accuracy of three automated systems for neuropsychological interpretation.

    Journal of clinical neuropsychology·1984
    Same journal

    Florida Kindergarten Screening Battery.

    Journal of clinical neuropsychology·1984
    Same journal

    Luria left in the lurch: unfulfilled promises are not valid tests.

    Journal of clinical neuropsychology·1984
    Same journal

    Methodological considerations in the use of attribute variables in neuropsychological research.

    Journal of clinical neuropsychology·1984
    Same journal

    Cued recall in amnesia.

    Journal of clinical neuropsychology·1984
    Same journal

    Classification of dementia patients by a WAIS profile related to central cholinergic deficiencies.

    Journal of clinical neuropsychology·1984
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Neuroscience
    • Developmental Psychology
    • Educational Psychology

    Background:

    • Reading disability is a complex condition with varied underlying causes.
    • Previous research suggests the existence of distinct subtypes of reading difficulties.
    • Understanding these subtypes is crucial for targeted interventions.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate and identify distinct subtypes of reading disability using cluster analysis.
    • To characterize the identified subgroups based on specific cognitive and linguistic measures.
    • To assess the reproducibility and clinical utility of the identified typology.

    Main Methods:

    • A battery of 23 measures assessing reading, language, and various cognitive functions was administered to 65 children with reading disabilities.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • The K-means iterative partitioning method was employed as the primary clustering technique.
  • Cluster stability and quality were evaluated using specialized techniques and comparative analyses.

    • Main Results:

    • Cluster analysis revealed three stable and reproducible subtypes of reading disability.
    • The identified clusters were characterized by: (1) visual processing deficits, (2) generalized language disorders, and (3) minimal deficits.
    • These subgroups align with previous research on reading disability subtypes.

    Conclusions:

    • The study identified distinct subtypes of reading disability, including visual processing, language, and minimal deficit groups.
    • While consistent with prior research, the heterogeneity of the clusters suggests limited current clinical utility.
    • Future research with more severely affected individuals may yield more homogeneous and clinically applicable subtypes.