Perinatal mortality: standardizing for birthweight is biased

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 2, 2026

Neurodevelopmental Reflex Testing in Neonatal Rat Pups
09:35

Neurodevelopmental Reflex Testing in Neonatal Rat Pups

Published on: April 24, 2017

A J Wilcox, I T Russell

    American Journal of Epidemiology
    |December 1, 1983
    PubMed

    Standardization is often used to compare perinatal mortality between populations with different birthweight distributions. Unfortunately, the relationship between perinatal mortality and birthweight seldom satisfies one prerequisite for standardization. Furthermore, standardizing for birthweight is biased against populations with heavier birthweights. For example, the standardized perinatal mortality rate of the heavier of two populations is biased upwards by 15 to 25% when the difference in mean birthweight between those populations is 150 g. As a result, the use of standardization may confuse the interpretation of differences in perinatal mortality.

    More Related Videos

    The Perinatal Asphyxiated Lamb Model: A Model for Newborn Resuscitation09:03

    The Perinatal Asphyxiated Lamb Model: A Model for Newborn Resuscitation

    Published on: August 15, 2018

    Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index06:55

    Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

    Published on: January 8, 2020

    Related Concept Videos

    Regression Toward the Mean01:52

    Regression Toward the Mean

    Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...
    Weighted Mean00:57

    Weighted Mean

    While taking the arithmetic, geometric, or harmonic mean of a sample data set, equal importance is assigned to all the data points. However, all the values may not always be equally important in some data sets. An intrinsic bias might make it more important to give more weightage to specific values over others.
    For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...
    z Scores and Area Under the Curve01:17

    z Scores and Area Under the Curve

    z scores are the standardized values obtained after converting a normal distribution into a standard normal distribution. A z score is measured in units of the standard deviation. The z score tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a z score of zero.
    Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

    Bias in Epidemiological Studies

    Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is: