Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The 4% fallacy: R.I.P.

R Kastenbaum

    International Journal of Aging & Human Development
    |January 1, 1983
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    The 4% fallacy, a flawed statistical concept, is addressed. This response aims to put the fallacy to rest, acknowledging its persistence despite clear methodological critiques.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Multiple perspectives on a geriatric "Death Valley".

    Community mental health journal·2013
    Same author

    The moment of death: is hospice making a difference?

    The Hospice journal·2000
    Same author

    Death personification in the Kevorkian era.

    Death studies·1997
    Same author

    Patterns and meanings of prayer in hospice caregivers: an exploratory study.

    Death studies·1993
    Same author

    Death, suicide and the older adult.

    Suicide & life-threatening behavior·1992
    Same author

    Racism and the older voter? Arizona's rejection of a paid holiday to honor Martin Luther King.

    International journal of aging & human development·1991

    Area of Science:

    • Statistics
    • Research Methodology

    Background:

    • The 4% fallacy has been a subject of debate in scientific literature.
    • Logical and methodological critiques have been raised against this fallacy over the years.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To provide a final response to the 4% fallacy.
    • To address the ongoing persistence of this statistical fallacy.

    Main Methods:

    • Critical analysis of the 4% fallacy.
    • Review of existing literature and critiques.

    Main Results:

    • The 4% fallacy has been sufficiently addressed by prior critiques.
    • Those who continue to use the fallacy demonstrate its perceived invincibility.

    Conclusions:

    • It is time to conclude the discussion surrounding the 4% fallacy.
    • Further engagement with the fallacy is deemed unproductive.