Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Picture-digit differences in processing clock times.

P Goolkasian

    The American Journal of Psychology
    |January 1, 1984
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Digital clock times are processed faster than analog clockfaces. This format difference impacts task demands and shows how visual stimuli are interpreted, influencing time perception efficiency.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Location constancy and its effect on visual selection.

    Spatial vision·2001
    Same author

    A Web site in cognitive science.

    Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc·2001
    Same author

    Retinal location and its effect on the spatial distribution of visual attention.

    The American journal of psychology·2000
    Same author

    Pictures, words, and sounds: from which format are we best able to reason?

    The Journal of general psychology·2000
    Same author

    Development of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale. Item analysis, face, and criterion-related validity.

    Spine·1999
    Same author

    A randomized, double-blind, prospective pilot study of botulinum toxin injection for refractory, unilateral, cervicothoracic, paraspinal, myofascial pain syndrome.

    Spine·1998
    Same journal

    Attributing social meaning to animated shapes: A new experimental study of apparent behavior.

    The American journal of psychology·2021
    Same journal

    Scientific Study of Magic: Binet's Pioneering Approach Based on Observations and Chronophotography.

    The American journal of psychology·2018
    Same journal

    Child and Ancient Man: How to Define Their Commonalities and Differences.

    The American journal of psychology·2018
    Same journal

    Adolescent Aggression as Predicted from Parent-Child Relationships and Executive Functions.

    The American journal of psychology·2018
    Same journal

    The Effect of Collective Transitions on the Organization and Contents of Autobiographical Memory: A Transition Theory Perspective.

    The American journal of psychology·2018
    Same journal

    The Development and Validity of a Chinese Version of the Compound Remote Associates Test.

    The American journal of psychology·2018
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Human-Computer Interaction
    • Visual Perception

    Background:

    • Understanding how humans process different visual formats of time is crucial for interface design.
    • Previous research suggests potential differences in cognitive processing between symbolic (digits) and pictorial (clockfaces) representations.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate whether a shared numerical code underlies the processing of digital and clockface time displays.
    • To examine how task complexity and stimulus presentation affect the efficiency of time processing.

    Main Methods:

    • Experiments utilized digital and clockface time displays as stimuli.
    • Participants performed tasks including time reading and comparative judgments (early/late, same/different).
    • Interference effects between different time formats were analyzed.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Digital time formats were consistently processed faster than clockfaces across tasks.
    • The magnitude of this format effect was modulated by task demands and clockface location.
    • Clockface stimuli interfered with digital judgments, but not vice versa.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings suggest distinct processing pathways or efficiencies for digital versus clockface time representations.
    • Automatic processing of clockface times can interfere with cognitive tasks using digital formats.
    • Digital time displays appear more efficient for rapid cognitive processing compared to clockfaces.