Related Experiment Videos
Impulsivity and strategy transfer: metamemory as mediator
Child Development
|April 1, 1983
Summary
Impulsive and reflective children
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Developmental Psychology
- Educational Psychology
Background:
- Children's strategy acquisition, maintenance, and generalization are crucial for learning.
- Individual differences in cognitive tempo (impulsivity-reflectivity) and metamemory influence strategic behavior.
- Understanding these factors is key to optimizing educational interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how impulsivity-reflectivity and metamemory affect the acquisition, maintenance, and generalization of organizational strategies in children.
- To examine the mediating role of metamemory in the relationship between cognitive tempo and strategy use.
- To compare strategy performance between impulsive and reflective children.
Main Methods:
- Two experiments involving second- and third-grade children (N=144).
- Involved strategy training, transfer tasks, and control conditions.
- Assessed impulsivity-reflectivity, metamemory (knowledge of memory processes), and strategy use.
Main Results:
- Reflective children consistently scored higher in both strategy and metamemory compared to impulsive children.
- Metamemory significantly predicted strategic behavior, independent of cognitive tempo.
- Strategy use during transfer (but not initial training) was higher in reflective children, indicating better generalization.
Conclusions:
- Metamemorial processes appear to mediate strategy maintenance and generalization in children.
- Reflective children demonstrate superior ability to apply learned strategies in novel situations, linked to their metamemory.
- Interventions aimed at improving children's strategy use should consider both cognitive tempo and metamemory development.