Related Experiment Videos
Facilitation of difficult percutaneous ureteral stent insertion
The Journal of Urology
|December 1, 1982
Summary
Antegrade ureteral stent placement is effective for complete ureteral obstruction when retrograde methods fail. This technique successfully bypasses blockages and treats strictures, offering a viable alternative for challenging cases.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Interventional Radiology
Background:
- Retrograde ureteral stent placement is often unsuccessful in cases of complete ureteral obstruction or complex strictures.
- Percutaneous nephrostomy is typically used for drainage but can be adapted for stent insertion.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and challenges of antegrade ureteral stent placement in patients with previously unsuccessful retrograde attempts.
- To demonstrate that complete ureteral obstruction does not necessarily preclude stent insertion via an antegrade approach.
Main Methods:
- Antegrade ureteral stent placement was performed in 26 patients with failed retrograde attempts.
- Techniques included navigating complete obstructions, dilating strictures, and managing ureteral tortuosity and kinking.
- Fluoroscopy, pigtail catheters, and specialized guide wires were utilized.
Main Results:
- Successful ureteral stent insertion was achieved in patients with apparent complete obstruction.
- Fifteen patients with malignant or benign ureteral strictures underwent successful dilation and stenting.
- Ureteral tortuosity was managed with pigtail catheters; kinking in the renal pelvis was resolved with transparenchymal approaches and specialized catheters.
Conclusions:
- The antegrade approach is a valuable alternative for ureteral stent placement when retrograde techniques fail.
- Complete ureteral obstruction is not an absolute contraindication for ureteral stenting using an antegrade method.
- Specific technical challenges can be overcome with appropriate tools and manipulation under fluoroscopy.