Sinusoidal Sources
AC Sources
Sources of Law
Source Transformation
Design of Transmission Shafts
Transmission Line Design Considerations
You might also read
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Updated: Feb 11, 2026

Quantifying Vibrio cholerae Colonization and Diarrhea in the Adult Zebrafish Model
Published on: July 12, 2018
A cholera outbreak on Nauru was unlikely to have been caused by contaminated water or food. The population used individual rainwater tanks, which showed no signs of Vibrio cholerae contamination. A case-control study also ruled out a foodborne source. The study suggests that cholera may have spread through a non-point source route. This finding highlights the need to consider alternative transmission mechanisms in public health responses.
Area of Science:
Background:
Cholera outbreaks typically involve waterborne transmission. However, understanding alternative transmission routes is essential for effective prevention. Prior research has shown that Vibrio cholerae spreads through contaminated water or food. No prior work had resolved how cholera might spread in settings with clean water supplies. This gap motivated investigation into non-traditional transmission routes. Surveillance methods have been used to track cholera in communities. But these methods may miss indirect transmission pathways. Nauru's water supply system is unique, relying on rainwater catchment tanks. This setup raised questions about how cholera could spread without contaminated water.
Purpose Of The Study:
The study aimed to identify the transmission route of cholera in Nauru. It focused on whether waterborne or foodborne sources were responsible. The population had access to individual rainwater tanks. Surveillance of these tanks showed no V. cholerae contamination. This suggested alternative transmission routes were at play. The researchers sought to rule out primary waterborne or foodborne causes. They also aimed to determine if non-point sources could be involved. The study's findings could inform public health strategies in similar settings.
Main Methods:
The study used a matched pair, case-control design to assess transmission routes. Researchers examined water sources of infected and uninfected individuals. They tested rainwater catchment tanks for V. cholerae contamination. Surveillance was conducted on both symptomatic and asymptomatic cases. No contamination was detected in the water tanks. The study also analyzed food sources for potential contamination. No evidence of foodborne transmission was found. The findings suggested non-point source transmission was possible.
Main Results:
The study found no evidence of waterborne or foodborne transmission of cholera. Rainwater tanks of infected individuals showed no V. cholerae contamination. A case-control study ruled out a foodborne point source. The results suggested an alternative transmission route was likely. The primary mode of transmission remained unidentified. The findings indicated non-point source transmission was probable. No common source contamination was detected in water or food. The study highlighted the need for further investigation into transmission mechanisms.
Conclusions:
The study concluded that cholera in Nauru did not spread through contaminated water or food. Transmission likely occurred via a non-point source route. The findings suggest indirect transmission mechanisms may be involved. The study does not propose a specific alternative route. It highlights the importance of considering non-traditional transmission pathways. The results may inform public health responses in similar settings. No definitive transmission route was established. The study suggests further research is needed to identify the exact mechanism.
The study suggested that cholera in Nauru spread through a non-point source route, not contaminated water or food.
A matched pair, case-control study was used to assess whether waterborne or foodborne sources were responsible.
Rainwater tanks were tested to determine if waterborne transmission was possible, given the population's reliance on them.
The absence of contamination in water tanks indicated that waterborne transmission was unlikely.
The case-control study ruled out a foodborne point source for the cholera outbreak.
The study suggests that non-point source transmission should be considered in areas with clean water supplies.