Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Neuroimaging in head injury

A D Gean1, R S Kates, S Lee

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco General Hospital, USA.

New Horizons (Baltimore, Md.)
|August 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

This review covers imaging for non-penetrating head injuries. Computed tomography (CT) is key for initial diagnosis, while magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) helps assess subtle injuries later.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ex-PRESS glaucoma filter: an MRI compatible metallic orbital foreign body imaged at 1.5 and 3T.

Clinical radiology·2015
Same author

Interobserver variability in the assessment of CT imaging features of traumatic brain injury.

Journal of neurotrauma·2009
Same author

MRI findings in Susac's syndrome.

Neurology·2003
Same author

Hyperdense MCA resolved after tPA.

Neurology·2002
Same author

1998 plenary session: Imaging symposium. An overview of acute radiology.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·1999
Same author

Neuroimaging of AIDS. I. Central nervous system toxoplasmosis.

Neuroimaging clinics of North America·1997

Area of Science:

  • Neuroradiology
  • Neurotrauma Imaging

Background:

  • Non-penetrating head injuries are common.
  • Understanding their neuroradiologic manifestations is crucial for effective management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the neuroradiologic features of acute non-penetrating head injury.
  • To correlate neurotrauma pathophysiology with imaging findings.

Main Methods:

  • Review of neuroradiologic manifestations.
  • Correlation of pathophysiology with imaging features.
  • Discussion of Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) utility.

Main Results:

  • Computed tomography (CT) is the primary imaging modality for acute diagnosis.
  • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is valuable in subacute/chronic stages for subtle injuries.
  • MRI aids in assessing brainstem and white matter shearing injuries when CT is unremarkable.

Conclusions:

  • Imaging plays a vital role in diagnosing and characterizing head injuries.
  • CT and MRI offer complementary information for non-penetrating head trauma assessment.

Related Experiment Videos