Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026

Microarray-based Identification of Individual HERV Loci Expression: Application to Biomarker Discovery in Prostate Cancer
Published on: November 2, 2013
Variation in measurement of prostate-specific antigen: importance of method and lot variability
M H Wener1, P R Daum, M K Brawer
1Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle 98195, USA.
Abstract:
Equivalence between Hybritech Tandem and Abbott IMx PSA methods have been reported by some but not all previous investigators. To determine reasons for these differing conclusions, we measured serum PSA with three different lots each of IMx and Tandem-E kits. Overall, mean IMx results were significantly lower than Tandem-E results; however, for selected sera, the IMx results were consistently higher than the Tandem-E results. Lot-to-lot differences for the IMx method were significantly greater than those with the Tandem-E method. Most IMx/Tandem-E lot-to-lot comparisons had linear regression slopes that differed significantly from 1.0, but some did not. Conclusions concerning the equivalence of the IMx and the Tandem-E methods can be influenced both by variations in the proportions of free PSA in sera in tested populations and by lot-to-lot differences in the IMx method.
Related Concept Videos
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Random and Systematic Errors
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:

