Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Shape and refractive powers in corneal topography

S A Klein1, R B Mandell

  • 1School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley 94720-2020, USA.

Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
|September 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An Assessment of Earth's Climate Sensitivity Using Multiple Lines of Evidence.

Reviews of geophysics (Washington, D.C. : 1985)·2020
Same author

Diagnostic Performance of Contrast Enhanced Pulmonary Computed Tomography Angiography for the Detection of Angioinvasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Immunocompromised Patients.

Scientific reports·2017
Same author

Clinical value of imaging for lymph nodes evaluation with particular emphasis on ultrasonography.

Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie·2016
Same author

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation without fluconazole and fluoroquinolone prophylaxis.

Annals of hematology·2015
Same author

Allele-specific alien-driven diversity, immune responsiveness and MHC-restriction.

Immunology today·2014
Same author

Whole-body CT for lymphoma staging: feasibility of halving radiation dose and risk by iterative image reconstruction.

European journal of radiology·2013

This study compares four corneal power measures: instantaneous, axial, position, and refractive. Axial power, derived from slope, is most reliably measured by videokeratography and less sensitive to noise than other methods.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Optics
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Corneal power is crucial for refractive error assessment.
  • Videokeratography provides detailed corneal surface topography.
  • Different methods exist to represent corneal power, each with unique properties.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the relative advantages and disadvantages of four corneal power representations: instantaneous, axial, position, and refractive.
  • To evaluate these representations based on curvature, slope, coordinate position, and focal properties.

Main Methods:

  • Examined the interrelationship of four corneal power types.
  • Evaluated 12 hypothetical corneal shapes representing regular, irregular, and surgically altered corneas.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Refractive power shows limited association with shape-based powers (axial, instantaneous, position).
  • Axial power, based on slope, is most closely related to Purkinje image measurements and less sensitive to noise.
  • Instantaneous power best detects local curvature changes, relevant for conditions like keratoconus.

Conclusions:

  • Axial power is the most reliable videokeratography output due to its direct relation to slope and reduced noise sensitivity.
  • Videokeratographs approximating axial power can estimate refractive power, which can be precisely calculated if needed.
  • Each corneal power representation (instantaneous, axial, position, refractive) has distinct clinical applications.