Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Adaptive assignment versus balanced randomization in clinical trials: a decision analysis

D A Berry1, S G Eick

  • 1Duke University, Institute of Statistics and Decision Sciences, Durham, NC 27708, USA.

Statistics in Medicine
|February 15, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Treatment Efficacy Score-continuous residual cancer burden-based metric to compare neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy between randomized trial arms in breast cancer trials.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2022
Same author

Risk of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome among older women receiving anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer on Modern Cooperative Group Trials (Alliance A151511).

Breast cancer research and treatment·2016
Same author

Emerging innovations in clinical trial design.

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2015
Same author

The Signature Program: Bringing the Protocol to the Patient.

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2015
Same author

CYP2D6 genotype and adjuvant tamoxifen.

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2014
Same author

Assessment of local vocal fold deformation characteristics in an in vitro static tensile test.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2011
Same journal

Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Identifiable Copula-Double-Cox Models: A Fully Parametric Framework for Dependent Right-Censored Survival Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Moving From Individualized Risk-Based Prevention to Benefit-Based Prevention: Estimating Individualized Life-Years Gained From Prevention Services as a Basis for Eligibility.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Mixture of Distributed Lag Non-Linear Models to Account for Spatially Heterogeneous Exposure-Lag-Response Associations.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Practical Considerations for Gaussian Process Modeling for Causal Inference in Quasi-Experimental Studies With Panel Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Covariate Adjustment for Wilcoxon Two Sample Statistic and Test.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Balanced randomization is effective for clinical trials with common diseases. Adaptive treatment allocation methods offer advantages when a large proportion of patients are in the trial.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials
  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Research

Background:

  • Effective patient treatment is crucial in clinical research.
  • Treatment allocation strategies impact trial outcomes and patient care.
  • Comparing different methods is essential for optimizing clinical trial design.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare balanced randomization with four adaptive treatment allocation procedures.
  • To determine the most effective strategy for treating patients both within and outside a clinical trial.
  • To evaluate the applicability of different allocation methods based on disease prevalence and trial participation.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of balanced randomization and adaptive treatment allocation.
  • Evaluation of treatment effectiveness for patients in and out of the trial.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessment of procedural complexity and applicability in clinical research settings.

    • Main Results:

    • Balanced randomization is a satisfactory method for common diseases.
    • Adaptive procedures are more complex but potentially more effective when a substantial patient proportion is enrolled.
    • The choice of method depends on disease prevalence and trial scope.

    Conclusions:

    • Randomization is suitable for moderately common diseases.
    • Adaptive allocation may be beneficial in specific clinical research scenarios with high patient enrollment.
    • Careful consideration of disease characteristics and trial design is necessary for optimal treatment allocation.