Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Spreadsheet method for determining sample sizes for heart valve studies

W N Anderson1

  • 1Natural Science Division, Pepperdine University, Malibu CA 90263, USA.

The Journal of Heart Valve Disease
|January 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Generalized pairwise comparison methods to analyze (non)prioritized composite endpoints.

Statistics in medicine·2019
Same author

A method for the determination of fat in faeces.

The Biochemical journal·2010
Same author

Method for the determination of fat in the stool (translation).

"Laboratorio;" analisis clinicos, bacteriologia, inmunologia, parasitologia, hematologia, anatomia patologica, quimica clinica·2010
Same author

Actuarial versus actual freedom from structural valve deterioration with the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprostheses.

The Canadian journal of cardiology·1999
Same author

Structural valve deterioration in mitral replacement surgery: comparison of Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular porcine and perimount pericardial bioprostheses.

The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·1999
Same author

Quality of life in patients with bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses. Evaluation of cohorts of patients aged 51 to 65 years at implantation.

Circulation·1998
Same journal

Impact of Patient-Specific Material Properties on Aneurysm Wall Stress: Finite Element Study.

The Journal of heart valve disease·2021
Same journal

Range of Pulmonary Autograft Responses to Systemic Pressure Immediately After Ross Procedure.

The Journal of heart valve disease·2021
Same journal

Evolution of Bilateral Mammary Arterial Grafting Program in Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

The Journal of heart valve disease·2021
Same journal

Double Valve Failure Due to Perceval Sutureless Aortic Valve Migration.

The Journal of heart valve disease·2018
Same journal

Use of AngioVac for Removal of Tricuspid Valve Vegetation.

The Journal of heart valve disease·2018
Same journal

Management of Late Paravalvular Leak after Transcatheter Valve Placement in Calcified Mitral Annulus.

The Journal of heart valve disease·2018
See all related articles

This study implements a heart valve clinical trial sample size calculation method on a spreadsheet. It ensures the most powerful statistical test for precise significance and power, optimizing study design.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Devices
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Accurate sample size calculation is crucial for clinical study validity.
  • Previous methods for heart valve study sample sizes exist.
  • Implementing these methods efficiently is key for researchers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a practical spreadsheet implementation of the Grunkemeier, Johnson, and Naftel sample size method.
  • To compute the optimal sample size for the most powerful statistical test.
  • To facilitate the generation of all necessary graphs and tables within a spreadsheet environment.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a computer spreadsheet to implement a known sample size calculation method.
  • Focused on identifying the sample size for the most statistically powerful test at a given significance level.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Ensured all graphical and tabular outputs are generated directly on the spreadsheet.
  • Main Results:

    • A functional spreadsheet tool for calculating sample sizes for heart valve clinical studies.
    • Demonstrated that adherence to the most powerful test ensures optimal statistical power.
    • Eliminated the need for specialized statistical software or functions.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed spreadsheet provides an accessible and efficient tool for clinical trial sample size determination.
    • This implementation aids researchers in designing more powerful and statistically sound studies.
    • The method ensures that the calculated sample size supports the most powerful statistical test, avoiding larger sample sizes for less powerful tests.