Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interpreting the standardized difference

D Tritchler1

  • 1Division of Epidemiology and Statistics, Ontario Cancer Institute, Toronto, Canada.

Biometrics
|March 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Age and drug therapy are key prognostic factors for first clinical fracture in patients with primary osteoporosis.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2007
Same author

Modeling complex disease with demographic and environmental covariates and a candidate gene marker.

Genetic epidemiology·2002
Same author

A comparison of some allele-sharing based linkage analysis methods for detecting complex trait loci.

Genetic epidemiology·1999
Same author

Reasoning about data with directed graphs.

Statistics in medicine·1999
Same author

Modelling study quality in meta-analysis.

Statistics in medicine·1999
Same author

Diet and breast cancer.

Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.)·1998
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Discussion on "INTACT: a method for integration of longitudinal physical activity data from multiple sources" by Jingru Zhang, Erjia Cui, Hongzhe Li, and Haochang Shou.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

This study provides an interpretation of standardized difference to assess its importance. This method aids in designing two-sample studies when key statistical information is missing.

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics
  • Research Methodology

Background:

  • Standardized difference is a crucial metric in statistical analysis.
  • Interpreting the practical significance of standardized differences is often challenging.
  • Designing robust two-sample studies requires appropriate statistical tools.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a clear interpretation of standardized difference.
  • To offer guidance on judging the importance of observed differences.
  • To facilitate the design of two-sample studies with limited prior information.

Main Methods:

  • Development of an interpretive framework for standardized difference.
  • Application of the framework to guide study design decisions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Illustrative examples for practical use in research.

    • Main Results:

    • A method for interpreting the magnitude of standardized differences is presented.
    • The interpretation assists in determining practical significance beyond statistical significance.
    • The approach is particularly valuable when mean difference or standard deviation data is scarce.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed interpretation enhances the utility of standardized difference.
    • This interpretive approach supports more informed study design, especially in preliminary stages.
    • Researchers can better assess the importance of differences and plan studies effectively.