Surgical repair and reconstruction of valvular lesions

Thirty-six years have passed since the inception of mitral valve repair by Lillehei and McGoon. In the period presently under review it is apparent that mitral valve repair and the late results have become more predictable. Previously, repair was not attempted because of concern that valve replacement, with its attendant problems, might be necessary. This attitude appears to be slowly changing. The current issue is whether patients who have severe mitral regurgitation but are relatively asymptomatic should be referred for repair before ventricular function deteriorates or atrial fibrillation develops. Current evidence suggests that approximately 10% of asymptomatic patients will progress sufficiently each year to require surgical intervention. Systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve causing left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, has, since the era of routine intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography, become a well-recognized occasional consequence of mitral valve repair. Numerous theories have been suggested as to its cause: the most plausible suggest that risk factors include the presence of excess valvular tissue, a bulging septum, a nondilated hyperdynamic left ventricle, and a narrow mitral-aortic angle. The fact that numerous annuloplasty techniques exist, each having its own proponent(s), suggests that different techniques or types of annuloplasty are equally effective. Reparative techniques for the aortic valve have lagged behind those for the mitral valve because of limited previous success. The type of valve pathology was recently classified in terms of repair and new techniques, which are briefly documented, have been tried.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)