Related Experiment Videos
Quantitative structure-toxicity relationships and volume fraction analyses for selected esters
J S Jaworska1, R S Hunter, T W Schultz
1Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee 37831-6034, USA.
Summary
Ester toxicity differs between aquatic organisms. Fish toxicity is higher due to hydrolysis, unlike in ciliates where nonpolar narcosis dominates. This impacts chemical risk assessment.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Toxicology
- Ecotoxicology
- Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR)
Background:
- Esters are common environmental contaminants with varying toxicity.
- Understanding ester toxicity mechanisms is crucial for ecological risk assessment.
- Comparative toxicity studies in different organisms highlight species-specific responses.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the acute toxicity of aliphatic and aromatic mono- and diesters in two eukaryotic organisms.
- To elucidate the toxicological mechanisms of esters in Tetrahymena pyriformis (ciliates) and Pimephales promelas (fish).
- To develop and validate quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) for ester toxicity.
Main Methods:
- Utilized two standard ecotoxicity assays: Tetrahymena pyriformis population growth impairment (IGC50) and Pimephales promelas mortality (LC50).
- Employed static 2-day and flow-through 4-day test systems, respectively.
- Analyzed toxicity data using quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) based on 1-octanol/water partition coefficient (log Kow) and volume fraction (Vf).
Main Results:
- In Tetrahymena, esters exhibited toxicity consistent with nonpolar narcosis, with toxicity correlating strongly with log Kow.
- In Pimephales, in vivo hydrolysis significantly increased ester toxicity beyond nonpolar narcosis predictions, leading to a unique QSAR.
- Hydrolysis in fish created a non-reducing concentration gradient, enhancing toxicant uptake compared to thermodynamic equilibrium.
Conclusions:
- Ester toxicity mechanisms differ between ciliates and fish, primarily due to the role of in vivo hydrolysis in fish.
- QSAR models effectively describe ester toxicity, but species-specific metabolic processes like hydrolysis must be considered.
- Findings emphasize the importance of considering metabolic activation and uptake dynamics in environmental risk assessment of esters.