Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Customized dual data entry for computerized data analysis

J Cummings1, J Masten

  • 1Wildlife International Limited, Easton, Maryland 21601.

Quality Assurance (San Diego, Calif.)
|September 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Global assessment of partial artemisinin resistance: multicenter trial across Kenya, Peru, and Thailand in patients with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria.

International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases·2025
Same author

Challenges and opportunities for novel combination therapies in Alzheimer's disease: a report from the EU/US CTAD Task Force.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease·2025
Same author

Donanemab: Appropriate use recommendations.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease·2025
Same author

Clinical Meaningfulness in Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trials. A Report from the EU-US CTAD Task Force.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease·2024
Same author

The AlzMatch Pilot Study - Feasibility of Remote Blood Collection of Plasma Biomarkers for Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease Trials.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease·2024
Same author

Burden of Illness in People with Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review of Epidemiology, Comorbidities and Mortality.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease·2024
Same journal

Peer Review as a QA Tool in Environmental Applications.

Quality assurance (San Diego, Calif.)·2006
Same journal

The use of double anonymity in peer review: a decision whose time has come?

Quality assurance (San Diego, Calif.)·2006
Same journal

Major issues in quality assessment and improvement of clinical hyperbaric services: an international perspective.

Quality assurance (San Diego, Calif.)·2006
Same journal

Evaluation of customer satisfaction level of different projects.

Quality assurance (San Diego, Calif.)·2006
Same journal

Establishing tolerance levels for customer complaints.

Quality assurance (San Diego, Calif.)·2006
Same journal

The historical impact of ISO 9000 on Lebanese firms.

Quality assurance (San Diego, Calif.)·2005
See all related articles

Implementing a dual data entry system significantly enhances data integrity and quality assurance. This method reduces errors, improving efficiency in data management and study reviews.

Area of Science:

  • Data Management
  • Quality Assurance
  • Clinical Research

Background:

  • Data integrity is crucial for Quality Assurance Units (QUA).
  • Data entry errors compromise study review quality, accuracy, and efficiency.
  • Manual error correction is time-consuming and inefficient.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate the dual data entry system for reducing data entry errors.
  • To improve the overall quality and efficiency of data management processes.
  • To enhance the accuracy and auditability of electronic data.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing specialized software to create customized data entry screens mirroring data collection forms.
  • Employing two independent data entry operators to create two separate data sets.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Performing electronic comparison of the two data sets to identify discrepancies.

    • Main Results:

    • The dual entry system effectively minimizes keypunch errors.
    • Discrepancies are identified and corrected by referencing original data sheets.
    • The incidence of errors is theoretically limited to identical errors made by both operators.
    • Time spent on dual entry is less than manual discrepancy correction.

    Conclusions:

    • Dual data entry is a highly effective technique for ensuring data integrity.
    • This method significantly improves data quality, accuracy, and audit efficiency in all subsequent data management steps.
    • The adoption of dual data entry supports robust quality assurance and reliable study outcomes.