Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating residual background noise in human auditory brain-stem responses

M Don1, C Elberling

  • 1Electrophysiology Laboratory, House Ear Institute, Los Angeles, California 90057.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|November 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary

This study empirically examined residual background noise in auditory brainstem response (ABR) averages. Bayesian estimation techniques effectively minimize noise, improving ABR test accuracy and efficiency.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Discussion of Signal-processing Potentials; Cochlear Implants.

Acta oto-laryngologica·2020
Same author

Discussion of Signal-processing Potentials; Acoustic Hearing Aids.

Acta oto-laryngologica·2020
Same author

Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome due to banana: an uncommon entity.

European annals of allergy and clinical immunology·2013
Same author

Risk factors of paediatric community-acquired pneumonia.

The European respiratory journal·2011
Same author

How to treat children's pneumonia: a complex problem.

The European respiratory journal·2010
Same author

Alpha- and beta-secretase activity as a function of age and beta-amyloid in Down syndrome and normal brain.

Neurobiology of aging·2006

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Signal Processing

Background:

  • Residual background noise in auditory brainstem response (ABR) averages can impact test accuracy.
  • Traditional methods like artifact rejection and standard averaging have limitations in noise management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To empirically investigate the nature of residual background noise in ABR averages.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of Bayesian estimation techniques in minimizing noise and improving ABR analysis.
  • To analyze the impact of sweep block sizes on noise control using Bayesian methods.

Main Methods:

  • Empirical examination of residual noise in ABR averages of normal-hearing subjects.
  • Estimation of residual noise using the Elberling and Don technique.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Acquisition of 10,000 sweeps per stimulus level (30-48 dB p-p.e. SPL) in 2-dB steps.
  • Application of Bayesian estimation (Elberling and Wahlgreen) for weighted averaging.
  • Analysis of smaller sweep block sizes' effect on nonstationary noise control.

    • Main Results:

    • Demonstrated shortcomings of artifact rejection and standard averaging.
    • Showcased the ability of Bayesian estimation to form weighted averages and minimize noise.
    • Analyzed the influence of sweep block size on the Bayesian technique's noise control capabilities.

    Conclusions:

    • Bayesian estimation techniques effectively minimize residual noise in ABR recordings.
    • Optimizing noise reduction enhances the utility of statistical methods for ABR quality control.
    • These combined techniques improve ABR test interpretation accuracy and clinical efficiency, potentially reducing medical costs.