Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Collaborative benchmarking in health care

D Mosel1, B Gift

  • 1Voluntary Hospitals of America (VHA) Tri-State, Indianapolis.

The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement
|May 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Insulin-like growth factor-I augments prolactin and inhibits growth hormone release through distinct as well as overlapping cellular signaling pathways.

Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part B, Biochemistry & molecular biology·2001
Same author

For benchmarking success choose right topics.

Healthcare benchmarks·1996
Same author

Enhancing quality improvement team effectiveness.

Quality management in health care·1993
Same author

On the road to TQM.

Food management·1992
Same author

Continuing to do well.

Food management·1989
Same author

Marketing update. Enhancing customer satisfaction in home care.

Caring : National Association for Home Care magazine·1987

Collaborative benchmarking unites healthcare providers to improve processes. This approach involves topic selection, collaborative formation, and study execution using the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle for enhanced quality improvement.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Management
  • Quality Improvement
  • Organizational Learning

Background:

  • Traditional benchmarking relies on voluntary networks of healthcare providers cooperating on studies.
  • Collaborative benchmarking offers a structured approach to inter-organizational quality improvement initiatives.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline the three phases of collaborative benchmarking: topic selection, collaborative establishment, and study execution.
  • To provide examples of collaborative benchmarking in healthcare, focusing on workers' compensation and admissions processes.

Main Methods:

  • The study describes a three-phase model for collaborative benchmarking: topic selection, collaborative formation, and study execution.
  • It highlights the use of the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle within the study execution phase.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Internal and external benchmarking approaches are discussed within the collaborative framework.

    • Main Results:

    • Effective collaborative benchmarking requires leadership commitment, quality improvement experience, organizational preparedness, and key process identification.
    • Factors such as organizational learning capacity, customer knowledge, resource availability, and leadership understanding influence benchmarking effectiveness.

    Conclusions:

    • Collaborative benchmarking is a structured, multi-phase process that can enhance healthcare quality improvement.
    • Prerequisites and accelerators are crucial for the successful implementation and impact of collaborative benchmarking initiatives.