Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating test methods by estimating total error

V M Chinchilli1, W G Miller

  • 1Center for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, College of Medicine, Pennsylvania, State University, Hershey 17033.

Clinical Chemistry
|March 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dietary Methionine and Total Sulfur Amino Acid Restriction in Healthy Adults.

The journal of nutrition, health & aging·2023
Same author

Internalized skin bias: validation study to explore the impact of the internalization of social stigma on those with hidradenitis suppurativa.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2022
Same author

Relation between broiler and human Campylobacter jejuni strains isolated in Belgium from 2011 to 2013.

Journal of applied microbiology·2018
Same author

Complete Genome Sequence of Campylobacter jejuni Strain 12567, a Livestock-Associated Clade Representative.

Genome announcements·2018
Same author

Complete Genome Sequences of Three Campylobacter jejuni Phage-Propagating Strains.

Genome announcements·2018
Same author

From Theory to Practice: Measuring end-of-life communication quality using multiple goals theory.

Patient education and counseling·2016
Same journal

Comparison of Information-Dependent Acquisition and Sequential Window Acquisition of All Theoretical Mass Spectra for Untargeted Drug Testing on a Linear Ion Trap-Pulsing Quadrupole-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometer.

Clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Patterns of One-Year Change in HbA1c and Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Metrics in Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.

Clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

TSH Pediatric Reference Intervals: Lack of CALIPER Applicability to US-Based Populations.

Clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Rapid Detection of Hemoglobinopathy Variants Using One-Step Library Preparation and Nanopore Sequencing.

Clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Editor's Note: Circulating Proteolytic Products of Carboxypeptidase N for Early Detection of Breast Cancer.

Clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

In Reply to Reflexing NT-proBNP for sFlt-1/PlGF Ratios That Fall into the Measurement Uncertainty for Preeclampsia Risk Classification.

Clinical chemistry·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a new method for evaluating test accuracy using intrasubject relative mean square error. This approach offers a more accurate assessment of total error for individuals compared to existing guidelines.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Chemistry
  • Method Validation

Background:

  • Test method evaluation commonly uses repeated measures designs comparing new methods to established ones.
  • Existing methods like the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) guidelines have limitations in accurately assessing total error.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel measure of total error, the intrasubject relative mean square error, for evaluating test methods.
  • To develop a distribution-free statistical methodology for assessing the acceptability of test method errors across a population.

Main Methods:

  • Calculated intrasubject relative mean square error, incorporating intrasubject relative bias and coefficient of variation.
  • Developed individual subject scores based on total error estimates compared to a maximum allowable value.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Applied a distribution-free statistical methodology with upper tolerance limits to evaluate population-level error acceptability.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed intrasubject relative mean square error provides a more nuanced measure of total error than previous methods.
    • Individual scores exceeding 100% indicate unacceptable total error for that subject.
    • The distribution-free methodology allows for confidence in determining if total error is acceptable for a majority of the population.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed method offers a superior approach to evaluating test method accuracy by focusing on individual total error.
    • The NCEP guidelines' definition of total error contains significant statistical inaccuracies.
    • Prioritizing population-level total error acceptability for most individuals (e.g., 95%) is crucial for reliable test method evaluation.