Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A new identity for misidentification syndromes

M D Banov1, A R Kulick, G Oepen

  • 1Psychotic Disorders Program, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA 02178.

Comprehensive Psychiatry
|November 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary

Delusional misidentification syndromes are difficult to study due to confusing names. This study proposes a new classification system to improve research and understanding of these syndromes.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Anabolic-Androgenic Steroid Use Among 1,010 College Men.

The Physician and sportsmedicine·2016
Same author

Attributes of long-term heavy cannabis users: a case-control study.

Psychological medicine·2003
Same author

Family study of the aggregation of eating disorders and mood disorders.

Psychological medicine·2003
Same author

Delayed disclosure by victims of child sexual abuse: an important topic for study.

Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)·2003
Same author

Muscle dysmorphia: a new syndrome in weightlifters.

British journal of sports medicine·2002
Same author

Residual neuropsychologic effects of cannabis.

Current psychiatry reports·2001

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psychiatry
  • Clinical Psychology

Background:

  • Delusional misidentification syndromes (DMS) present diagnostic challenges.
  • Current nomenclature relies on eponyms, leading to confusion.
  • A standardized classification is needed for research advancement.

Observation:

  • A case report highlighted the inadequacies of existing terminology for DMS.
  • The case illustrated the ambiguity in classifying delusional beliefs.
  • Current naming conventions hinder clear communication and research.

Findings:

  • The existing eponymic system for DMS is imprecise and confusing.
  • A new, structured classification system for DMS is proposed.
  • This system aims to enhance clarity and research consistency.

Implications:

  • Improved classification can facilitate better understanding of DMS.
  • A standardized system may aid in differential diagnosis.
  • This work could advance research into the neurobiology of delusions.

Related Experiment Videos