Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dose

R Katz1

  • 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nebraska, Lincolon 68588-0111.

Radiation Research
|March 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Dose is an unreliable predictor of radiation effects, especially for high-energy particles. Understanding radiation interactions requires considering factors like fluence and cross-section for accurate biological response prediction.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Extended-spectrum β-lactamases genes in Gram-negative isolates from an urban river in Nicaragua.

Brazilian journal of biology = Revista brasleira de biologia·2025
Same author

Gastroschisis ultrasound bowel characteristics demonstrate minimal impact on perinatal outcomes.

Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine·2023
Same author

Cladosporium Leaf Spot Caused by <i>Cladosporium variabile</i> in Winter High Tunnel Production of Spinach (<i>Spinacia oleracea</i>) in Maine, United States.

Plant disease·2022
Same author

Inclusion of Veterinary Services in national emergency management plans.

Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics)·2020
Same author

Assessment of the reliability and validity of a novel point-of-care fibrinogen (F-Point) device against an industry standard at fibrinogen levels >2 g/L in non-haemorrhage scenarios.

International journal of obstetric anesthesia·2020
Same author

Development of a two-dimensional dynamic model of the foot-ankle system exposed to vibration.

Journal of biomechanics·2019
Same journal

KRT6A Impairs Radiosensitivity in Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Enhancing Fatty Acid Synthesis.

Radiation research·2026
Same journal

Chromosomal Instability: A Potential Biomarker of Radiation Response.

Radiation research·2026
Same journal

Antioxidant Probucol Reduces Mortality in Mice Exposed to Lethal Doses of Ionizing Radiation.

Radiation research·2026
Same journal

The Detection of Radiation Effects in the Urine of Rhesus Macaques Using Raman Spectroscopy.

Radiation research·2026
Same journal

Characterization of Radiation-responsive Genes and Transcript Variants under Different Radiation Qualities, Doses and Dose Rates.

Radiation research·2026
Same journal

Methyl Quercetin Inhibits Radiation-induced Senescence and TGF-β1-induced Myofibroblast Differentiation Through Psmad3/TGF-Β Signaling.

Radiation research·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Radiobiology
  • Radiation Physics

Background:

  • The conventional use of absorbed dose in radiobiology relies on instrument availability, not fundamental interaction mechanisms.
  • Energy deposition is a secondary effect, not the primary cause of radiation-induced biological damage.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To challenge the universal applicability of absorbed dose as a normalizing parameter in radiobiology.
  • To highlight the limitations of dose-based predictions, particularly for high-LET radiations and varying radiation qualities.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of radiation interaction mechanisms.
  • Critique of dose-based radiobiological models.
  • Exploration of alternative parameters like fluence and cross-section.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Absorbed dose is a poor predictor of biological end points, especially when comparing radiations of different qualities.
  • Energy deposition is primarily governed by inelastic electron collision cross-sections, which correlate poorly with observed biological effects for heavy ions.
  • Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE) values vary widely (0.01 to infinity), underscoring dose's inadequacy.

Conclusions:

  • Absorbed dose is generally a useless predictor of biological response, except in highly specific, narrowly defined situations.
  • Fluence and cross-section offer a more fundamental description of radiation interactions.
  • Rethinking the fundamental basis of radiobiological predictions is necessary for improved accuracy.