Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Analyzing consensus in personality judgments: a variance components approach

P E Shrout1

  • 1Department of Psychology, New York University, NY 10003.

Journal of Personality
|December 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Two plus two equals three? Do we need to rethink lifetime prevalence?

Psychological medicine·2009
Same author

Psychometric evaluation of the Spanish version of CONNECT: a measure of continuity of care in mental health services.

International journal of methods in psychiatric research·2007
Same author

Gender differences in the relationship of homelessness to symptom severity, substance abuse, and neuroleptic noncompliance in schizophrenia.

The Journal of nervous and mental disease·2001
Same author

Risk factors for homelessness among indigent urban adults with no history of psychotic illness: a case-control study.

American journal of public health·2000
Same author

Measurement reliability and agreement in psychiatry.

Statistical methods in medical research·1998
Same author

Causal modeling of epidemiological data on psychiatric disorders.

Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology·1998
Same journal

Identifying Robust Longitudinal Transactions Between Loneliness and the Big Five Personality Traits.

Journal of personality·2026
Same journal

The (Simp)le Truth About Excessive and Obsessive Romantic Behaviors in Men.

Journal of personality·2026
Same journal

The Robust Quadratic Association Between Resting Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia and Agreeableness: The Evidence From Two Samples in China.

Journal of personality·2026
Same journal

Ego, Elevation, and Exclusion: Bidirectional Prospective Associations Between Narcissism and Status and Inclusion.

Journal of personality·2026
Same journal

Life Narratives and the Ten Aspects of the Big Five Across Open-Ended and Targeted Prompts.

Journal of personality·2026
Same journal

Life Stories Matter: The Contribution of Narrative Identity to Personality Functioning and Functional Impairment.

Journal of personality·2026
See all related articles

Peer raters show modest agreement on personality traits. This study explores variance components methods to analyze factors influencing consensus, including social categories. These methods offer insights into rating agreement variations.

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Personality Psychology

Background:

  • Interpersonal agreement on personality judgments is a cornerstone of personality assessment.
  • However, the degree of consensus among peer raters is frequently modest, necessitating methods to understand its determinants.
  • Existing methods may not fully capture the nuances of consensus influenced by social factors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and explore the utility of variance components methods for analyzing determinants of consensus in personality ratings.
  • To demonstrate how these methods can explicitly examine the influence of social categories on interrater agreement.
  • To discuss the limitations and potential applications of the variance components approach in personality research.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Adaptation of variance components methods from generalizability theory for analyzing personality consensus.
  • Application of these methods to investigate how social categories of targets and raters impact judgment agreement.
  • Illustration of the methods using simulated (artificial) data for clarity and demonstration.

    • Main Results:

    • Variance components methods provide a framework for dissecting the sources of agreement and disagreement in personality ratings.
    • These methods can reveal how shared or differing social categories between targets and raters contribute to variations in consensus.
    • The analysis highlights gradations in consensus, offering a more nuanced understanding than simple agreement measures.

    Conclusions:

    • Variance components methods offer untapped potential for a deeper understanding of consensus in personality trait ratings.
    • The approach allows for the systematic investigation of social categorization effects on interpersonal judgments.
    • Further application of these methods can enhance the study of interrater reliability and social perception.