Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

International Lp(a) standardization

C Labeur¹, M Rosseneu, O Henderson

¹Innogenetics N.V., Ghent, Belgium.

Chemistry and Physics of Lipids

|January 1, 1994

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The Development of Fluorescence Intensity Standards.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2016

Same author

A female-specific desaturase gene responsible for diene hydrocarbon biosynthesis and courtship behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster.

Insect molecular biology·2006

Same author

Penetratin-membrane association: W48/R52/W56 shield the peptide from the aqueous phase.

Biophysical journal·2004

Same author

Comparison of the aggregation properties, secondary structure and apoptotic effects of wild-type, Flemish and Dutch N-terminally truncated amyloid beta peptides.

The European journal of neuroscience·2001

Same author

Apoptosis induced in neuronal cells by C-terminal amyloid beta-fragments is correlated with their aggregation properties in phospholipid membranes.

Molecular membrane biology·2001

Same author

Effect of mutations of N- and C-terminal charged residues on the activity of LCAT.

Journal of lipid research·2001

Same journal

The impact of avobenzone and oxybenzone on fibroblast and keratinocyte membranes. Searching for the role of lipids in the effect of UV filters on skin cells.

Chemistry and physics of lipids·2026

Same journal

Interaction of tryptophan-based peptides with mixed lipid bilayers modulates bilayers' hydrophobic region in an anionic lipid-dependent manner.

Chemistry and physics of lipids·2026

Same journal

Emerging roles of dehydrogenase/reductase (DHRS) in cancer.

Chemistry and physics of lipids·2026

Same journal

Molecular dynamics insights into lipid bilayer electroporation under constant versus pulsed DC electric fields.

Chemistry and physics of lipids·2026

Same journal

7-ketocholesterol as a theranostic target: Potential applications and future perspectives.

Chemistry and physics of lipids·2026

Same journal

Corrigendum to Lipid membrane behavior of nitro-fatty acids and their loading into liposomes to activate Nrf2 pathway in RAW264.7 cells with impact on intracellular NO production [Chem. Phys. Lipids 270 (2025) 105497].

Chemistry and physics of lipids·2026

See all related articles

Standardizing lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) measurements is crucial. Two surveys revealed that the lack of a common primary standard and poor assay precision cause significant inter-laboratory variation in Lp(a) testing.

Area of Science:

Clinical Chemistry
Biochemistry
Lipidology

Background:

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease.
Accurate and reproducible Lp(a) measurements are essential for clinical risk assessment.
Previous studies indicated significant variability in Lp(a) quantification across different laboratories.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the causes of inter-laboratory variation in Lp(a) measurements.
To assess the impact of different sample handling techniques on Lp(a) quantification.
To identify key factors contributing to discrepancies in Lp(a) assay results.

Main Methods:

Conducted two international surveys of Lp(a) measurements from 1989 to 1991.
Included a large number of participants and diverse sample types (liquid, frozen, lyophilized).

Related Experiment Videos

Analyzed inter- and intra-laboratory coefficients of variation and effects of techniques and antisera.

Main Results:

The primary cause of inter-laboratory variation was the absence of a common primary standard for Lp(a).
Poor assay precision, indicated by large intra-assay coefficients of variation, was a significant contributing factor.
No consistent effects of freezing or lyophilization were observed, though lyophilized samples trended lower.
Variability was comparable across different sample states and Lp(a) phenotypes.

Conclusions:

The lack of a standardized primary reference material is the main driver of Lp(a) measurement variability.
Assay imprecision further exacerbates inter-laboratory discrepancies in Lp(a) testing.
Standardization efforts are critical to improve the reliability of Lp(a) clinical measurements.