Factors affecting functional outcome of displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures

Open reduction and internal fixation is often required in comminuted, displaced intra-articular fractures of the distal radius when closed manipulation has failed to restore articular congruity. Results of surgical stabilization and articular reconstruction of these injuries are reviewed in this retrospective study of 49 patients with 52 displaced, intra-articular distal radius fractures. Forty-three patients with a mean age of 37 years (range, 17-79 years) were available for evaluation. The mean follow-up time was 38 months (range, 22-69 months). When rated by the system proposed by the Association for the Study of Internal Fixation (ASIF), 19 were ASIF type C2 and 21 were ASIF type C3. An injury score system based on the initial injury x-ray films was used to classify severely comminuted intra-articular fractures and to identify those associated with carpal injury. Postoperative fracture alignment, articular congruity, and radial length were significantly improved following surgery. Grip strength averaged 69 +/- 22% of the contralateral side, and range of motion averaged 75 +/- 18% of the contralateral side after surgery. A combined outcome rating system that included grip strength, range of motion, and pain relief averaged 76 +/- 19% of the contralateral side. Using regression analysis, a significant decrease was found in the combined rating with more severe fracture patterns as defined by the ASIF system, Malone classification, and the injury score system. The injury score system presented here and, in particular, the number of fracture fragments correlated most closely with the outcome of all classification systems examined. Operative treatment of complex distal radius fractures with reconstruction of articular congruity with internal fixation and/or external fixation can significantly improve functional outcome. The degree to which articular step-off, gap between fragments, and radial shortening are improved by surgery is strongly correlated with improved outcome, even when the results are corrected for severity of initial injury, whereas correction of radial tilt or dorsal tilt did not correlate with improved outcome.