Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ethical considerations

D P Sulmasy1, D FitzGerald, J H Jaffin

  • 1Division of General Internal Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC.

Critical Care Clinics
|October 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Disentangling Centrality Bias and Final-State Effects in the Production of High-p_{T} Neutral Pions Using Direct Photon in d+Au Collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=200  GeV.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Dapsone Induced Methaemoglobinaemia A reminder the iatrogenic causes of cyanosis.

Irish medical journal·2023
Same author

Measurement of Direct-Photon Cross Section and Double-Helicity Asymmetry at sqrt[s]=510  GeV in p[over →]+p[over →] Collisions.

Physical review letters·2023
Same author

Is perinatal substance abuse falling through the cracks?

Irish journal of psychological medicine·2023
Same author

Examining the impact of premature birth on parental mental health and family functioning in the years following hospital discharge: A review.

Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine·2023
Same author

Probing Gluon Spin-Momentum Correlations in Transversely Polarized Protons through Midrapidity Isolated Direct Photons in p^{↑}+p Collisions at sqrt[s]=200  GeV.

Physical review letters·2021
Same journal

Critical Care and Contagion: Evolving Frontiers of Infectious Diseases in the Modern Intensive Care Unit.

Critical care clinics·2026
Same journal

Advances and Challenges in Sepsis Care in Low-Resource Settings.

Critical care clinics·2026
Same journal

The Respiratory Triple Pandemic in the Intensive Care Unit: Epidemiology, Clinical Features and Management of COVID-19, Influenza and Respiratory Syncytial Virus.

Critical care clinics·2026
Same journal

Antibiotic Stewardship for the Intensivist.

Critical care clinics·2026
Same journal

Infection Prevention and Control in the Intensive Care Unit.

Critical care clinics·2026
Same journal

Antibiotic Considerations in the Critically Ill: Empiric Choices and Dosing.

Critical care clinics·2026
See all related articles

This study addresses ethical decision-making in trauma care, proposing a method to identify the primary decision-maker when patient capacity is compromised. It emphasizes patient well-being beyond biomedical health.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Clinical Decision-Making
  • Trauma Medicine

Background:

  • The doctor's oath prioritizes patient well-being, extending beyond biomedical health.
  • Clinical practice, especially in trauma, presents complex ethical challenges.
  • Determining decision-making capacity is crucial when patients cannot advocate for themselves.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a framework for identifying the primary decision-maker in clinical settings.
  • To address ethical controversies in trauma medicine.
  • To ensure patient-centered care when decision-making capacity is uncertain.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review on medical ethics and decision-making capacity.
  • Analysis of ethical dilemmas in trauma care scenarios.
Keywords:
Professional Patient Relationship

Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of a decision-making hierarchy for surrogate consent.

    • Main Results:

    • A structured approach to identifying surrogate decision-makers can be established.
    • Ethical frameworks can guide clinicians in complex trauma cases.
    • Recognizing non-biomedical aspects of patient good is essential.

    Conclusions:

    • A systematic method for identifying the primary decision-maker enhances patient advocacy.
    • Addressing ethical controversies in trauma medicine requires clear protocols.
    • The patient's good encompasses broader aspects than solely biomedical status.