Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Current reproductive technology: considerations for the oncologist

C A Winkel1, G T Fossum

  • 1Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.)
|March 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Role of a symptom-based algorithmic approach to chronic pelvic pain.

International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics·2018
Same author

Role of a symptom-based algorithmic approach to chronic pelvic pain.

International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics·2001
Same author

Medical and surgical therapies for pain associated with endometriosis.

Journal of women's health & gender-based medicine·2001
Same author

A cost-effective approach to the management of endometriosis.

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology·2000
Same author

Is the standard of care what we think it is?

JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons·2000
Same author

Modeling of medical and surgical treatment costs of chronic pelvic pain: new paradigms for making clinical decisions.

The American journal of managed care·1999
Same journal

Emerging T-Cell Engagers and Novel Immunotargets in Multiple Myeloma.

Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Access to Care and the Affordable Care Act: Why Do Problems Exist 15 Years Later?

Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Synchronous Endometrial and Ovarian Cancers: A Case Study and Literature Review.

Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Perceived Social Support, Anxiety, and Depression Among Women With Breast Cancer.

Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Before Certainty.

Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Adult T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma and Epstein-Barr Virus-Positive DLBCL: A Rare Concomitant Association.

Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.)·2026
See all related articles

Cancer treatments can impact fertility. Reproductive technologies like sperm banking and in vitro fertilization offer fertility preservation options for male and female patients, enabling future family planning.

Area of Science:

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Oncology
  • Medical Ethics

Background:

  • Cancer treatments can cause irreversible damage to reproductive organs, leading to infertility.
  • Oncologists must consider fertility preservation when planning treatment for cancer patients of reproductive age.
  • Advances in reproductive technologies offer viable solutions for fertility preservation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review current reproductive technologies available for cancer patients.
  • To highlight the importance of fertility preservation in cancer treatment planning.
  • To discuss the potential for future advancements in this field.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on assisted reproductive technologies (ART).
  • Analysis of sperm banking and cryopreservation techniques.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo cryopreservation.

    • Main Results:

    • Cryopreserved sperm can be stored indefinitely, with successful pregnancies reported up to 15 years post-freezing.
    • In vitro fertilization allows for pregnancy using donated or autologous eggs, with resulting embryos also storable.
    • Future technologies may enable ova extraction at the time of ovarian surgery for freezing.

    Conclusions:

    • Reproductive technologies provide significant hope for future fatherhood and motherhood for cancer survivors.
    • Fertility preservation should be an integral part of cancer treatment discussions.
    • Ongoing technological advancements promise expanded options for cancer patients facing fertility loss.