Larger nondeclarative than declarative deficits in learning and memory in human aging

This study used classical conditioning as a measure of nondeclarative learning and compared it with verbal learning as a declarative measure. Eighty participants were tested using 1 of 2 paradigms (400-ms and 750-ms delay) for eyeblink classical conditioning (EBCC) and the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT). Large age differences were observed in the nondeclarative EBCC task, even in the 750-ms paradigm, which is more optimal for older adults. Age differences in the nondeclarative EBCC task were larger in the 400-ms paradigm and equal in the 750-ms paradigm to the magnitude of age differences in the declarative CVLT task. Partial correlations (removing the variance that was due to age) showed no relation between performance on the nondeclarative and declarative tasks. The results contradict the common assumption that, in the same participants, nondeclarative learning and memory are more resistant to the effects of aging than are declarative learning and memory and suggest that nondeclarative learning and memory are not unitary.