Related Experiment Videos
Disinfection and sterilization of composite polishing instruments
W H Tate1, M C Goldschmidt, M T Ward
1University of Texas-Houston Dental Branch, Department of General Dentistry, Section of Operative Dentistry, 77030-3402, USA.
American Journal of Dentistry
|October 1, 1995
Summary
Autoclaving, chemiclaving, and microwaving effectively sterilized dental composite finishing instruments. Cold chemical disinfectants, including glutaraldehyde, were less reliable for sterilization and disinfection.
Area of Science:
- Dental materials science
- Infection control in dentistry
- Instrument reprocessing
Background:
- Composite finishing and polishing instruments require effective sterilization and disinfection.
- Maintaining instrument integrity during reprocessing is crucial for patient safety.
- Various chemical and physical methods exist for dental instrument reprocessing.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the efficacy of multiple sterilization and disinfection techniques.
- To evaluate these methods on two distinct composite finishing and polishing instruments.
Main Methods:
- Tested instruments: proprietary light-cured resin cup (abrasive-impregnated) and silicon dioxide-impregnated rubber cup.
- Evaluated chemical methods: iodophor, synthetic phenol, glutaraldehyde.
- Evaluated physical methods: microwaving, autoclaving, and chemiclaving.
Main Results:
- Glutaraldehyde demonstrated effectiveness as a disinfectant.
- Other cold chemical disinfectants showed unreliable performance.
- Autoclaving, chemiclaving, and microwaving proved effective for sterilization.
Conclusions:
- Physical sterilization methods (autoclaving, chemiclaving, microwaving) are reliable for composite finishing instruments.
- Cold chemical disinfectants require careful consideration due to variable efficacy.
- Proper instrument reprocessing is vital for preventing cross-contamination in dental settings.