Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Marginal bone levels around maxillary implants supporting overdentures or fixed prostheses: a comparative study using

S Palmqvist1, K Sondell, B Swartz

  • 1Prosthodontic Department, Postgraduate Dental Education Center, Orebro, Sweden.

The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
|March 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cutting through the noise: A narrative review of Alzheimer's disease plasma biomarkers for routine clinical use.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease·2025
Same author

Estimates of Current Capacity for Diagnosing Alzheimer's Disease in Sweden and the Need to Expand Specialist Numbers.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease·2024
Same author

Screening over Speech in Unselected Populations for Clinical Trials in AD (PROSPECT-AD): Study Design and Protocol.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease·2023
Same author

Efficacy of memantine in PDD and DLB: an extension study including washout and open-label treatment.

International journal of geriatric psychiatry·2010
Same author

Comparison of solutions for TM-polarized nonlinear guided waves.

Optics letters·2009
Same author

Financial systems' impact on dental care; a review of fee-for-service and capitation systems.

Community dental health·2007

Maxillary implants supporting overdentures showed no significant marginal bone loss compared to fixed prostheses. Advanced narrow-beam radiography confirmed similar bone levels around implants in both groups, challenging previous findings.

Area of Science:

  • Dental Implantology
  • Oral Surgery
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Assessing marginal bone levels around maxillary implants supporting overdentures is challenging with conventional radiography.
  • Previous studies suggested potential continuous marginal bone loss around maxillary overdenture implants, but evidence is limited.
  • Severely resorbed maxillae present unique difficulties for radiographic evaluation of implant osseointegration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare marginal bone levels around maxillary implants supporting overdentures versus fixed prostheses.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of narrow-beam radiography in assessing bone levels in resorbed maxillae.
  • To investigate potential differences in bone height between implant-supported overdenture and fixed prosthesis groups.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized detailed narrow-beam radiography for precise visualization of implants and surrounding bone.
  • Compared marginal bone height around implants in patients with overdentures to a matched control group with fixed prostheses.
  • Included patients with severely resorbed maxillae to assess radiographic technique in challenging cases.

Main Results:

  • No statistically significant difference in marginal bone height was observed between the overdenture and fixed prosthesis groups.
  • Narrow-beam radiography provided excellent depiction of implants and bone in severely resorbed maxillae.
  • The findings contrast with earlier reports indicating continuous marginal bone loss in maxillary overdenture implants.

Conclusions:

  • Maxillary implants supporting overdentures do not exhibit significantly different marginal bone levels compared to those supporting fixed prostheses.
  • Narrow-beam radiography is a valuable tool for accurate assessment of marginal bone around implants in challenging anatomical situations.
  • This study provides new evidence suggesting comparable bone stability for different types of maxillary implant-supported prostheses.