Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quantitative EEG in frontotemporal dementia

G G Yener1, A F Leuchter, D Jenden

  • 1Department of Neurology, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir Turkey.

Clinical EEG (Electroencephalography)
|April 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sexually dimorphic differences in angiogenesis markers predict brain aging trajectories.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2023
Same author

Comparison of sporadic and familial behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (FTD) in a North American cohort.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2020
Same author

The effect of psychotropic drugs on cortical excitability and plasticity measured with transcranial magnetic stimulation: Implications for psychiatric treatment.

Journal of affective disorders·2019
Same author

Dopamine receptor D<sub>4</sub> (DRD<sub>4</sub>) polymorphisms with reduced functional potency intensify atrophy in syndrome-specific sites of frontotemporal dementia.

NeuroImage. Clinical·2019
Same author

Cognitive rehabilitation group intervention for breast cancer survivors: results of a randomized clinical trial.

Psycho-oncology·2015
Same author

Application of quantitative DTI metrics in sporadic CJD.

NeuroImage. Clinical·2014
Same journal

Time distribution of seizures during long-term video-EEG monitoring.

Clinical EEG (electroencephalography)·2003
Same journal

Sequential EEG analysis during intermittent photic stimulation in never-medicated patients with schizophrenia.

Clinical EEG (electroencephalography)·2003
Same journal

Apneic seizures in infants: role of continuous EEG monitoring.

Clinical EEG (electroencephalography)·2003
Same journal

Olfactory event-related potentials in normal subjects and patients with smell disorders.

Clinical EEG (electroencephalography)·2003
Same journal

Effects of stimulus modality and response mode on the P300 event-related potential differentiation of young and elderly adults.

Clinical EEG (electroencephalography)·2003
Same journal

Focal seizures and EEG: prognostic considerations.

Clinical EEG (electroencephalography)·2003
See all related articles

Quantitative Electroencephalography (QEEG) effectively differentiates Alzheimer's disease (AD) from Frontotemporal dementia (FTD). This neuroimaging technique shows promise for improving diagnostic accuracy in degenerative dementias.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Accurate diagnosis of major degenerative dementias remains challenging.
  • Diagnostic precision for Alzheimer's disease (AD) is high (~90%), but for Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) it is low (<20%).
  • Previous research indicates distinct EEG patterns in AD (focal/generalized slowing) versus FTD (normal EEG).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the utility of Quantitative Electroencephalography (QEEG) in differentiating between AD and FTD.
  • To assess the diagnostic accuracy of QEEG in distinguishing AD, FTD, and healthy controls.

Main Methods:

  • A study involving 26 AD patients, 13 FTD patients, and 27 healthy controls.
  • Utilized Quantitative Electroencephalography (QEEG) with five specific measures.
  • Employed stepwise discriminant function analysis for group classification.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • QEEG achieved 84.6% accuracy in distinguishing AD from FTD.
  • Healthy controls were classified with 100% accuracy, and FTD patients with 84.6% accuracy.
  • Key QEEG variables for differentiation included temporal beta-2 relative power and parietal theta, alpha, and beta-2 relative power.

Conclusions:

  • QEEG demonstrates significant potential as a tool to aid in the differential diagnosis between AD and FTD.
  • The findings suggest QEEG can improve diagnostic accuracy for these challenging neurodegenerative conditions.
  • Further research may validate QEEG's role in clinical settings for dementia diagnosis.